We have located links that may give you full text access.
Determinants of serum insulin-like growth factor I in growth hormone deficient adults as compared to healthy subjects.
Clinical Endocrinology 1998 April
OBJECTIVE: Growth hormone status is an important determinant of serum IGF-I but it is well known that hypopituitary adults with pronounced GH-deficiency (GHDA) may exhibit normal IGF-I levels. To elucidate possible causes of this apparent paradox we compared the significance of putative IGF-I predictors in GHDA and normal subjects.
DESIGN: A cross-sectional study.
SUBJECTS: Twenty-seven GHDA (9 females, 18 males, mean +/- SE age 44 +/- 1 years) and 27 healthy control subjects (9 females, 18 males, mean +/- SE age 43 +/- 2 years).
RESULTS: Serum IGF-I and IGFBP-3 were significantly lower in GHDAs, but a considerable overlap existed (IGF-I (microgram/l) 87 +/- 12 (GHDA) vs 177 +/- 10 (Control) (P < 0.001)). In both Controls and GHDA, IGF-I was higher in males than females (Control: 196 +/- 12 vs 138 +/- (P = 0.004); GHDA: 97 +/- 16 vs 56 +/- 11 (P = 0.05)). In GHDA, males on testosterone substitution had the highest IGF-I concentrations. The molar IGF-I:IGFBP-3 ratio was significantly lower in GHDAs (0.18 +/- 0.01 vs 0.23 +/- 0.02 (P = 0.002)). IGFBP-1 (microgram/l) was significantly elevated in GHDAs (6.28 +/- 1.11 vs 3.07 +/- 0.32 (P < 0.001)) despite comparable fasting insulin levels. Percentage total body fat (TBF, DEXA, waist/hip ratio, and intra-abdominal fat (CT) were all elevated in GHDAs. IGF-I correlated positively with lean body mass (DEXA) and negatively with TBF and IGFBP-1 in both groups. IGF-I correlated negatively with age in CON but not in GHDAs, whereas IGF-I correlated positively with IGFBP-3 only in GHDAs. Multiple regression analysis revealed that age and IGFBP-1 were the only significant predictors of IGF-I in CON, whereas IGFBP-3 and, to a lesser extent TBF, were the only independent predictors of IGF-I in GHDAs. Neither peak stimulated GH, nor physical fitness contributed in any equations in the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: 1) IGF-I levels are regulated by several variables in addition to GH status 2) age per se is an independent negative determinant in healthy subjects but not in GHDA 3) it is probable that some cases of paradoxically high IGF-I levels in GHDA are secondary to inappropriately elevated IGFBP-3 levels. 4) in mid-adulthood males have higher IGF-I levels than females and it is likely that testosterone directly stimulates IGF-I. The influence of gender and sex steroids must therefore be accounted for when comparing IGF-I levels between hypopituitary and healthy subjects.
DESIGN: A cross-sectional study.
SUBJECTS: Twenty-seven GHDA (9 females, 18 males, mean +/- SE age 44 +/- 1 years) and 27 healthy control subjects (9 females, 18 males, mean +/- SE age 43 +/- 2 years).
RESULTS: Serum IGF-I and IGFBP-3 were significantly lower in GHDAs, but a considerable overlap existed (IGF-I (microgram/l) 87 +/- 12 (GHDA) vs 177 +/- 10 (Control) (P < 0.001)). In both Controls and GHDA, IGF-I was higher in males than females (Control: 196 +/- 12 vs 138 +/- (P = 0.004); GHDA: 97 +/- 16 vs 56 +/- 11 (P = 0.05)). In GHDA, males on testosterone substitution had the highest IGF-I concentrations. The molar IGF-I:IGFBP-3 ratio was significantly lower in GHDAs (0.18 +/- 0.01 vs 0.23 +/- 0.02 (P = 0.002)). IGFBP-1 (microgram/l) was significantly elevated in GHDAs (6.28 +/- 1.11 vs 3.07 +/- 0.32 (P < 0.001)) despite comparable fasting insulin levels. Percentage total body fat (TBF, DEXA, waist/hip ratio, and intra-abdominal fat (CT) were all elevated in GHDAs. IGF-I correlated positively with lean body mass (DEXA) and negatively with TBF and IGFBP-1 in both groups. IGF-I correlated negatively with age in CON but not in GHDAs, whereas IGF-I correlated positively with IGFBP-3 only in GHDAs. Multiple regression analysis revealed that age and IGFBP-1 were the only significant predictors of IGF-I in CON, whereas IGFBP-3 and, to a lesser extent TBF, were the only independent predictors of IGF-I in GHDAs. Neither peak stimulated GH, nor physical fitness contributed in any equations in the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: 1) IGF-I levels are regulated by several variables in addition to GH status 2) age per se is an independent negative determinant in healthy subjects but not in GHDA 3) it is probable that some cases of paradoxically high IGF-I levels in GHDA are secondary to inappropriately elevated IGFBP-3 levels. 4) in mid-adulthood males have higher IGF-I levels than females and it is likely that testosterone directly stimulates IGF-I. The influence of gender and sex steroids must therefore be accounted for when comparing IGF-I levels between hypopituitary and healthy subjects.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app