We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Predictive signs of discogenic lumbar pain on magnetic resonance imaging with discography correlation.
Spine 1998 June 2
STUDY DESIGN: The correlation between discogenic lumbar pain and disc morphology was investigated by using magnetic resonance imaging and discography.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the various pathologic parameters seen on magnetic resonance imaging in patients with discogenic lumbar pain and to correlate them with observations on discography.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although numerous previous studies on the subject have been performed, the correlations between various pathologic findings on magnetic resonance imaging and pain reproduction by provoked discography have not been explained fully.
METHODS: One hundred and one lumbar discs in 39 patients were studied with magnetic resonance imaging and pain provocation discography. When pain reproduction under discography was concordant, various pathologic parameters on magnetic resonance imaging were analyzed by three statistical parameters to determine the associated magnetic resonance imaging findings.
RESULTS: Radial tears commonly are demonstrated on magnetic resonance imaging in discs with concordant pain on discography. The presence of these tears is not a reliable predictor of a painful disc on discography. Although a high-intensity zone on T2-weighted images is a relatively reliable predictor of pain, the statistical values were lower than those in previous studies. Massive degeneration and severe disc height loss were rare in this population. These findings were good predictors of pain on disc injection.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the lumbar intervertebral discs with posterior combined anular tears are likely to produce pain, the validity of these signs for predicting discogenic lumbar pain is limited.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the various pathologic parameters seen on magnetic resonance imaging in patients with discogenic lumbar pain and to correlate them with observations on discography.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although numerous previous studies on the subject have been performed, the correlations between various pathologic findings on magnetic resonance imaging and pain reproduction by provoked discography have not been explained fully.
METHODS: One hundred and one lumbar discs in 39 patients were studied with magnetic resonance imaging and pain provocation discography. When pain reproduction under discography was concordant, various pathologic parameters on magnetic resonance imaging were analyzed by three statistical parameters to determine the associated magnetic resonance imaging findings.
RESULTS: Radial tears commonly are demonstrated on magnetic resonance imaging in discs with concordant pain on discography. The presence of these tears is not a reliable predictor of a painful disc on discography. Although a high-intensity zone on T2-weighted images is a relatively reliable predictor of pain, the statistical values were lower than those in previous studies. Massive degeneration and severe disc height loss were rare in this population. These findings were good predictors of pain on disc injection.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the lumbar intervertebral discs with posterior combined anular tears are likely to produce pain, the validity of these signs for predicting discogenic lumbar pain is limited.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app