We have located links that may give you full text access.
Difficult tracheal intubation--analysis and management in 37 cases.
Singapore Medical Journal 1998 March
AIM: To analyse the anatomical features of difficult airways encountered during general anaesthesia and study how difficult intubation was circumvented during anaesthesia in our local population.
METHOD: Difficult intubation was defined as failure to visualise the larynx during laryngoscopy after neck flexion and external cricoid pressure was applied. All cases of difficult intubation collected over 1 1/2 years during general anaesthesia were recorded prospectively and analysed.
RESULTS: Thirty-seven cases of difficult intubation were identified among 5,379 cases of general anaesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation. 40.5% of the cases were not expected to be difficult pre-operatively. 5.4% of the cases were Lehane II, 91.9% Lehane III and 2.7% Lehane IV. The anatomical features encountered included receding chin, limited mouth opening, limited neck extension, abnormal dentition, short thyromental distance, large tongue, supraglottic mass and floppy epiglottis. Gum elastic bougie was commonly used to overcome the intubation difficulties. Laryngeal mask, blind nasal tracheal intubation, fiberoptic bronchoscopic intubation and sometimes an alternative anaesthetic technique, such as regional anaesthesia, were resorted to.
CONCLUSION: Assessment of multiple anatomical features would improve prediction of difficult intubation. Assessment of receding chin, neck extension, mouth opening, teeth, tongue size, thyromental distance might pick up 81% of difficult airways. Unexpected problems with epiglottis and glottic inlet are the potential sources of danger that are difficult to predict pre-operatively.
METHOD: Difficult intubation was defined as failure to visualise the larynx during laryngoscopy after neck flexion and external cricoid pressure was applied. All cases of difficult intubation collected over 1 1/2 years during general anaesthesia were recorded prospectively and analysed.
RESULTS: Thirty-seven cases of difficult intubation were identified among 5,379 cases of general anaesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation. 40.5% of the cases were not expected to be difficult pre-operatively. 5.4% of the cases were Lehane II, 91.9% Lehane III and 2.7% Lehane IV. The anatomical features encountered included receding chin, limited mouth opening, limited neck extension, abnormal dentition, short thyromental distance, large tongue, supraglottic mass and floppy epiglottis. Gum elastic bougie was commonly used to overcome the intubation difficulties. Laryngeal mask, blind nasal tracheal intubation, fiberoptic bronchoscopic intubation and sometimes an alternative anaesthetic technique, such as regional anaesthesia, were resorted to.
CONCLUSION: Assessment of multiple anatomical features would improve prediction of difficult intubation. Assessment of receding chin, neck extension, mouth opening, teeth, tongue size, thyromental distance might pick up 81% of difficult airways. Unexpected problems with epiglottis and glottic inlet are the potential sources of danger that are difficult to predict pre-operatively.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app