We have located links that may give you full text access.
Sonography as the primary screening technique for blunt abdominal trauma: experience with 899 patients.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology 1998 April
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of sonography when used routinely as the primary screening technique for blunt abdominal trauma.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: From December 1994 through December 1995, we used sonography as the primary screening technique for the initial assessment of blunt abdominal trauma. Sonography was performed by dedicated technologists and overseen and interpreted by radiology residents or attending physicians. A positive study was defined as evidence of free fluid or parenchymal injury. Sonographic findings were correlated with CT, surgery, or clinical follow-up.
RESULTS: Of the 899 sonograms obtained for blunt abdominal trauma, the findings of 783 were negative, 101 were positive, and 15 were indeterminate. Of the 783 sonograms with negative findings, 768 (98%) were confirmed by CT, surgery, or clinical follow-up. Similarly, of the 101 sonograms with positive findings, 95 (94%) were confirmed. Interpretations resulted in 15 false-negative and five false-positive examinations. For all sonograms, we calculated a sensitivity of 86%, a specificity of 99%, and an accuracy of 98%.
CONCLUSION: Sonography can be used effectively as the primary screening technique for blunt abdominal trauma.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: From December 1994 through December 1995, we used sonography as the primary screening technique for the initial assessment of blunt abdominal trauma. Sonography was performed by dedicated technologists and overseen and interpreted by radiology residents or attending physicians. A positive study was defined as evidence of free fluid or parenchymal injury. Sonographic findings were correlated with CT, surgery, or clinical follow-up.
RESULTS: Of the 899 sonograms obtained for blunt abdominal trauma, the findings of 783 were negative, 101 were positive, and 15 were indeterminate. Of the 783 sonograms with negative findings, 768 (98%) were confirmed by CT, surgery, or clinical follow-up. Similarly, of the 101 sonograms with positive findings, 95 (94%) were confirmed. Interpretations resulted in 15 false-negative and five false-positive examinations. For all sonograms, we calculated a sensitivity of 86%, a specificity of 99%, and an accuracy of 98%.
CONCLUSION: Sonography can be used effectively as the primary screening technique for blunt abdominal trauma.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app