We have located links that may give you full text access.
CLINICAL TRIAL
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Autologous stem cell transplantation for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphomas in first complete or partial remission: a retrospective analysis of the outcome of 52 patients according to the age-adjusted International Prognostic Index.
Bone Marrow Transplantation 1998 Februrary
The aim of the study was to retrospectively evaluate the outcome of patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in first complete (CR) or partial (PR) remission, according to the age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (IPI). Fifty-two consecutive patients, aged less than 60 years, with intermediate- or high-grade NHL, and at least one of the following adverse risk factors: bulky disease, B symptoms or Ann Arbor stage III-IV, and at least a PR after CHT (and radiotherapy (RT) on residual mediastinal mass when required), underwent ASCT conditioned with BAVC. Sixty-five percent (33/52) of the patients achieved CR after CHT; 69% (36/52) after CHT + RT; 90% (47/52) after CHT +/- RT + ASCT. One death during conditioning and three major toxic events after ASCT were recorded. Overall survival (OS) is 98% at 37 months (16-88); disease-free survival (DFS) is 100% at 27 months (7-82). Comparing the observed results with those expected if patients were treated only with CHT, the sequential treatment including ASCT conferred an advantage in terms of CR rate of 14, 23 and 54%, respectively, in the low-intermediate (LI), high-intermediate (HI) and high (H)-risk groups, respectively. The 2-year OS advantage is 10, 21, 31 and 63%, respectively, and the 2-year DFS advantage is 12, 26, 38 and 39%, respectively. Even more striking is the 5-year projected advantage in the number of patients alive without disease, even when considering only the low (L) (P < 0.0001) and the LI (P < 0.0001) risk groups. For patients in the higher (HI + H) risk groups, ASCT should be included in the initial plan of treatment as consolidation of first CR or PR, but the differences seen in this study suggest a formal comparison in a randomized study also for patients in the LI risk group.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app