Clinical Trial
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Evaluation of cerebral vasospasm after early surgical and endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Neurosurgery 1998 Februrary
OBJECTIVE: To document the influence of the treatment modality (early surgery versus early endovascular treatment) on measures of cerebral vasospasm in a nonrandomized series of 156 patients treated within 72 hours of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

METHODS: The following parameters were prospectively collected in a computerized data base and retrospectively analyzed for association with vasospasm-related ischemic infarctions: 1) Hunt and Hess (H&H) grade, 2) Fisher grade, 3) highest mean cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFVMAX) and maximum percent change in mean CBFV (%deltaCBFV) as recorded by transcranial Doppler ultrasound, 4) incidence of repeat subarachnoid hemorrhage, 5) incidence of delayed ischemic neurological deficits, 6) incidence of delayed ischemic infarctions, and 7) Glasgow Outcome Scale score.

RESULTS: Forty-one patients (26.3%) suffered ischemic infarctions. The ischemic infarction rate was correlated with higher H&H grade (P = 0.002), higher Fisher grade (P = 0.05), higher CBFVMAX (P < 0.001) and %deltaCBFV (P = 0.01), occurrence of repeat subarachnoid hemorrhage, occurrence of delayed ischemic neurological deficits, and endovascular treatment (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION: The infarction rate was higher with endovascular treatment versus surgery (37.7 versus 21.6%), as a result of a skewed Fisher Grade 4 infarction pattern in the endovascular treatment group versus the surgery treatment group (66.7 versus 24.5%). We suspect that unremoved subarachnoid/intracerebral clots contributed to the higher infarction rate with endovascular treatment. When patients with Fisher Grade 4 and H&H Grade V were excluded from analysis, the difference in infarct incidence between the treatment groups no longer reached statistical significance (Fisher Grades 1-3, P = 0.49; H&H Grades I-IV, P = 0.96).

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app