We have located links that may give you full text access.
Technetium-99m-MIBI scintimammography in palpable and nonpalpable breast lesions.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine 1998 January
UNLABELLED: The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of 99mTc-MIBI scintimammography in patients with palpable and nonpalpable breast cancer.
METHODS: One hundred and forty patients with a clinically palpable breast mass and/or suspicious mammographic finding had prone scintimammography after the intravenous injection of 740 MBq 99Tc-MIBI within 5 days before open biopsy or surgery. All patients had mammography within 2 mo before the scintimammography. The mammography was read as probably benign, probably malignant or indeterminate. The scintimammography was read as positive or negative for breast cancer. The scintigraphic studies were correlated with mammographic findings and with histopathology.
RESULTS: Histopathological studies showed that the mean tumor size for 61 palpable tumors was 2.57 cm with a range of 1-6 cm, and for 24 nonpalpable tumors the mean size was 1.34 cm with a range of 0.5-3 cm. Mammography had an overall sensitivity of 91.58% and a specificity of 42.87%; the sensitivity was 90.16% and 95.45% and specificity was 57.14% and 32.14% for palpable and nonpalpable tumors, respectively. Eight cases were considered indeterminate. Scintimammography was true-positive for 71 breast cancers, true-negative for 47, false-positive for 8 and false-negative for 14. The overall sensitivity was 83.5% and the specificity 85.4%. In the patients with palpable masses, sensitivity was 95.1% and specificity 75%; in those with nonpalpable lesions, sensitivity was only 54.2% and specificity, 93.5%. Among 18 cases of palpable abnormalities with probably benign mammography, six had true-positive scintimammography. Of eight patients with indeterminate mammography, one was true-positive on scintimammography.
CONCLUSION: Scintimammography is an accurate and clinically useful tool for evaluating patients with palpable breast abnormalities when mammography is negative and in the cases of indeterminate mammography. A significant improvement in lesion detectability is necessary in nonpalpable breast abnormalities.
METHODS: One hundred and forty patients with a clinically palpable breast mass and/or suspicious mammographic finding had prone scintimammography after the intravenous injection of 740 MBq 99Tc-MIBI within 5 days before open biopsy or surgery. All patients had mammography within 2 mo before the scintimammography. The mammography was read as probably benign, probably malignant or indeterminate. The scintimammography was read as positive or negative for breast cancer. The scintigraphic studies were correlated with mammographic findings and with histopathology.
RESULTS: Histopathological studies showed that the mean tumor size for 61 palpable tumors was 2.57 cm with a range of 1-6 cm, and for 24 nonpalpable tumors the mean size was 1.34 cm with a range of 0.5-3 cm. Mammography had an overall sensitivity of 91.58% and a specificity of 42.87%; the sensitivity was 90.16% and 95.45% and specificity was 57.14% and 32.14% for palpable and nonpalpable tumors, respectively. Eight cases were considered indeterminate. Scintimammography was true-positive for 71 breast cancers, true-negative for 47, false-positive for 8 and false-negative for 14. The overall sensitivity was 83.5% and the specificity 85.4%. In the patients with palpable masses, sensitivity was 95.1% and specificity 75%; in those with nonpalpable lesions, sensitivity was only 54.2% and specificity, 93.5%. Among 18 cases of palpable abnormalities with probably benign mammography, six had true-positive scintimammography. Of eight patients with indeterminate mammography, one was true-positive on scintimammography.
CONCLUSION: Scintimammography is an accurate and clinically useful tool for evaluating patients with palpable breast abnormalities when mammography is negative and in the cases of indeterminate mammography. A significant improvement in lesion detectability is necessary in nonpalpable breast abnormalities.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app