We have located links that may give you full text access.
Skills and self-assessment in cardio-pulmonary resuscitation of the hospital nursing staff.
European Journal of Emergency Medicine : Official Journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine 1994 December
UNLABELLED: Differences in the success rates of the pre-hospital or in-hospital resuscitation attempts seem to be attributable to the skill of the various rescuers. Whereas the definite success rate for pre-hospital resuscitation is 7%, the corresponding rate for in-hospital settings is 15%. In this context, the resuscitation skills and the self-assessment of CPR methods of hospital staff were investigated.
METHODS: during 53 CPR refresher courses offered to nursing staff members, the individual skills and competence in CPR procedures of 425 nurses were examined according to the standards and guidelines of the German Medical Association. During the first part of the study the participants were asked to subjectively rate their proficiencies in CPR followed by a practical assessment of their manual CPR skills by an independent observer. Scores were calculated for artificial ventilation and chest compression. Quality criteria were defined, grouped and analysed statistically by the chi-squared test.
RESULTS: 16.2% of the participants felt sufficiently trained to perform CPR independently and 77.2% did not. Thirty-six percent estimated their CPR skills to be sufficient or good. Only four participants (0.9%) were able to perform all standard CPR procedures as recommended by the guidelines and 71.8% failed to perform effective CPR manoeuvres. The CPR skills did not differ with regard to the nurses' educational degree, professional experience, previous CPRs performed or work area within the hospital. Of the nursing staff, 6.6% were found to have good skills in artificial ventilation. The attempts at artificial ventilation made by 58.6% were completely inadequate. Correct chest compression was performed by 14.1%. The majority of the test group (44.7%) failed to carry out effective cardiac message.
CONCLUSIONS: CPR skills of hospital staff are inadequate, mainly because of lack of manual dexterity. Obviously the special skills learned in CPR courses are lost in spite of a positive self-assessment after a relatively short time. The results, however, do not suggest completely inadequate handling of CPR procedures in a hospital setting. Indeed, an increasing rate of successful resuscitations inside the hospital (up to 27%) has been reported in the literature. As a consequence of our findings, refresher courses in specific CPR techniques must be demanded, which should be made compulsory for nursing staff every 2 years.
METHODS: during 53 CPR refresher courses offered to nursing staff members, the individual skills and competence in CPR procedures of 425 nurses were examined according to the standards and guidelines of the German Medical Association. During the first part of the study the participants were asked to subjectively rate their proficiencies in CPR followed by a practical assessment of their manual CPR skills by an independent observer. Scores were calculated for artificial ventilation and chest compression. Quality criteria were defined, grouped and analysed statistically by the chi-squared test.
RESULTS: 16.2% of the participants felt sufficiently trained to perform CPR independently and 77.2% did not. Thirty-six percent estimated their CPR skills to be sufficient or good. Only four participants (0.9%) were able to perform all standard CPR procedures as recommended by the guidelines and 71.8% failed to perform effective CPR manoeuvres. The CPR skills did not differ with regard to the nurses' educational degree, professional experience, previous CPRs performed or work area within the hospital. Of the nursing staff, 6.6% were found to have good skills in artificial ventilation. The attempts at artificial ventilation made by 58.6% were completely inadequate. Correct chest compression was performed by 14.1%. The majority of the test group (44.7%) failed to carry out effective cardiac message.
CONCLUSIONS: CPR skills of hospital staff are inadequate, mainly because of lack of manual dexterity. Obviously the special skills learned in CPR courses are lost in spite of a positive self-assessment after a relatively short time. The results, however, do not suggest completely inadequate handling of CPR procedures in a hospital setting. Indeed, an increasing rate of successful resuscitations inside the hospital (up to 27%) has been reported in the literature. As a consequence of our findings, refresher courses in specific CPR techniques must be demanded, which should be made compulsory for nursing staff every 2 years.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app