We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Relationship between atrial fibrillation and typical atrial flutter in humans: activation sequence changes during spontaneous conversion.
Circulation 1997 November 19
BACKGROUND: A transitional rhythm precedes the spontaneous onset of atrial flutter in an animal model, but few data are available in man.
METHODS AND RESULTS: In 10 patients, 16 episodes of atrial fibrillation (166+/-236 seconds) converting into atrial flutter during electrophysiological evaluation were analyzed. A 20-pole catheter was used for mapping the right atrial free wall. Preceding the conversion was a characteristic sequence of events: (1) a gradual increase in atrial fibrillation cycle length (150+/-25 ms after onset, 166+/-28 ms before conversion, P<.01); (2) an electrically silent period (267+/-45 ms); (3) "organized atrial fibrillation" (cycle length, 184+/-24 ms) with the same right atrial free wall activation direction as during atrial flutter; (4) another delay on the lateral right atrium (283+/-52 ms); and (5) typical atrial flutter (cycle length, 245+/-38 ms). The coronary sinus generally had a different rate than the right atrial free wall until the beat that initiated flutter, when right atrium and coronary sinus were activated in sequence. During 1313 seconds of fibrillation, there were 171 episodes of "organized atrial fibrillation." An additional activation delay at least 30 ms longer than the mean organized atrial fibrillation cycle length was sensitive (100%) and specific (99%) for impending organization into atrial flutter. During organized atrial fibrillation, right atrial free wall activation was craniocaudal in 70% and caudocranial in 30%, which may explain why counterclockwise flutter is a more common clinical rhythm than clockwise flutter. Atrial flutter never degenerated into fibrillation, even after adenosine infusion.
CONCLUSIONS: Anatomic barriers, along with statistical properties of conduction and refractoriness during atrial fibrillation, may explain the remarkably stereotypical pattern of endocardial activation during the initiation of atrial flutter via fibrillation and the rarity of degeneration of flutter to fibrillation once it stabilizes.
METHODS AND RESULTS: In 10 patients, 16 episodes of atrial fibrillation (166+/-236 seconds) converting into atrial flutter during electrophysiological evaluation were analyzed. A 20-pole catheter was used for mapping the right atrial free wall. Preceding the conversion was a characteristic sequence of events: (1) a gradual increase in atrial fibrillation cycle length (150+/-25 ms after onset, 166+/-28 ms before conversion, P<.01); (2) an electrically silent period (267+/-45 ms); (3) "organized atrial fibrillation" (cycle length, 184+/-24 ms) with the same right atrial free wall activation direction as during atrial flutter; (4) another delay on the lateral right atrium (283+/-52 ms); and (5) typical atrial flutter (cycle length, 245+/-38 ms). The coronary sinus generally had a different rate than the right atrial free wall until the beat that initiated flutter, when right atrium and coronary sinus were activated in sequence. During 1313 seconds of fibrillation, there were 171 episodes of "organized atrial fibrillation." An additional activation delay at least 30 ms longer than the mean organized atrial fibrillation cycle length was sensitive (100%) and specific (99%) for impending organization into atrial flutter. During organized atrial fibrillation, right atrial free wall activation was craniocaudal in 70% and caudocranial in 30%, which may explain why counterclockwise flutter is a more common clinical rhythm than clockwise flutter. Atrial flutter never degenerated into fibrillation, even after adenosine infusion.
CONCLUSIONS: Anatomic barriers, along with statistical properties of conduction and refractoriness during atrial fibrillation, may explain the remarkably stereotypical pattern of endocardial activation during the initiation of atrial flutter via fibrillation and the rarity of degeneration of flutter to fibrillation once it stabilizes.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app