We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Stability of improvements in exercise performance and quality of life following bilateral lung volume reduction surgery in severe COPD.
Chest 1997 October
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term stability of improvements in exercise capacity and quality of life (QOL) after lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS).
DESIGN: Case-series analysis.
SETTING: University hospital.
PATIENTS: Twenty-six patients with severe airflow obstruction (mean FEV1 of 0.67+/-0.18 L) and moderate to severe hyperinflation (mean total lung capacity of 7.30+/-1.90 L).
INTERVENTION AND MEASUREMENTS: All patients underwent bilateral LVRS via median sternotomy. Serial measurement of lung function, symptom-limited cardiopulmonary exercise tests, 6-min walk distances (6MWD), and sickness impact profile (SIP) scores were done before, and at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months after surgery.
RESULTS: FEV1 (0.93+/-0.29 vs 0.68+/-0.19 L, p<0.001) increased while residual volume (3.47+/-1.2 vs 4.77+/-1.5 L, p<0.001) decreased significantly at 3 months post-LVRS compared to baseline, and these changes were maintained at 12 to 18 months follow-up. Similarly, the increase in 6MWD at 3 months post-LVRS (340+/-84 vs 251+/-114 m, p<0.001) was sustained at all follow-up times. On cardiopulmonary exercise testing, total exercise time (9.0+/-1.8 vs 6.1+/-1.9 min, p<0.001), oxygen uptake at peak exercise (VO2 peak) (14.9+/-4 vs 11.9+/-3 mL/kg/min, p<0.001), maximum oxygen pulse (7.43+/-2.37 vs 5.85+/-1.96 mL/beat, p<0.005), and maximum minute ventilation (VEmax) (30.3+/-10 vs 23.5+/-7.1 L/min, p<0.001) increased significantly at 3 months post-LVRS. On serial study following LVRS, total exercise time remained significantly greater at 6 (8.5+/-1.38 min) and 12 months (8.71+/-2.0 min) post-LVRS compared to baseline (5.81+/-1.9 min, p<0.05). VO2 peak tended to be higher at all follow-up periods (3 months, 16.1+/-4.3; 6 months, 14.5+/-2.6; 12 months, 14.1+/-3.5 mL/kg) compared to baseline (12.6+/-3.9 mL/kg, p=0.08). Similarly, maximum O2 pulse tended to be higher in all follow-up studies (3 months, 8.45+/-2.7; 6 months, 7.6+/-1.7; 12 months, 7.42+/-2.1 mL/beat) compared to baseline (6.39+/-2.5 mL/beat, p=0.06). Higher VEmax continued to be observed at 6 (30+/-10 L/min) and 12 months (28+/-10 L/min) post-LVRS, compared to baseline (23+/-7 L/min, p=0.02). VEmax post-LVRS was significantly higher at 3 and 6 months compared to baseline on post-hoc analysis (p<0.05). Overall SIP scores were lower at 3 months (7 vs 18, p<0.0002) post-LVRS and were sustained in long-term follow-up.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that bilateral LVRS via median sternotomy in selected patients with severe, diffuse emphysema improves exercise performance and QOL at 3 months following LVRS and these improvements are maintained for at least 12 to 18 months in follow-up.
DESIGN: Case-series analysis.
SETTING: University hospital.
PATIENTS: Twenty-six patients with severe airflow obstruction (mean FEV1 of 0.67+/-0.18 L) and moderate to severe hyperinflation (mean total lung capacity of 7.30+/-1.90 L).
INTERVENTION AND MEASUREMENTS: All patients underwent bilateral LVRS via median sternotomy. Serial measurement of lung function, symptom-limited cardiopulmonary exercise tests, 6-min walk distances (6MWD), and sickness impact profile (SIP) scores were done before, and at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months after surgery.
RESULTS: FEV1 (0.93+/-0.29 vs 0.68+/-0.19 L, p<0.001) increased while residual volume (3.47+/-1.2 vs 4.77+/-1.5 L, p<0.001) decreased significantly at 3 months post-LVRS compared to baseline, and these changes were maintained at 12 to 18 months follow-up. Similarly, the increase in 6MWD at 3 months post-LVRS (340+/-84 vs 251+/-114 m, p<0.001) was sustained at all follow-up times. On cardiopulmonary exercise testing, total exercise time (9.0+/-1.8 vs 6.1+/-1.9 min, p<0.001), oxygen uptake at peak exercise (VO2 peak) (14.9+/-4 vs 11.9+/-3 mL/kg/min, p<0.001), maximum oxygen pulse (7.43+/-2.37 vs 5.85+/-1.96 mL/beat, p<0.005), and maximum minute ventilation (VEmax) (30.3+/-10 vs 23.5+/-7.1 L/min, p<0.001) increased significantly at 3 months post-LVRS. On serial study following LVRS, total exercise time remained significantly greater at 6 (8.5+/-1.38 min) and 12 months (8.71+/-2.0 min) post-LVRS compared to baseline (5.81+/-1.9 min, p<0.05). VO2 peak tended to be higher at all follow-up periods (3 months, 16.1+/-4.3; 6 months, 14.5+/-2.6; 12 months, 14.1+/-3.5 mL/kg) compared to baseline (12.6+/-3.9 mL/kg, p=0.08). Similarly, maximum O2 pulse tended to be higher in all follow-up studies (3 months, 8.45+/-2.7; 6 months, 7.6+/-1.7; 12 months, 7.42+/-2.1 mL/beat) compared to baseline (6.39+/-2.5 mL/beat, p=0.06). Higher VEmax continued to be observed at 6 (30+/-10 L/min) and 12 months (28+/-10 L/min) post-LVRS, compared to baseline (23+/-7 L/min, p=0.02). VEmax post-LVRS was significantly higher at 3 and 6 months compared to baseline on post-hoc analysis (p<0.05). Overall SIP scores were lower at 3 months (7 vs 18, p<0.0002) post-LVRS and were sustained in long-term follow-up.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that bilateral LVRS via median sternotomy in selected patients with severe, diffuse emphysema improves exercise performance and QOL at 3 months following LVRS and these improvements are maintained for at least 12 to 18 months in follow-up.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app