We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Merkel cell carcinoma. Comparison of Mohs micrographic surgery and wide excision in eighty-six patients.
Dermatologic Surgery : Official Publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et Al.] 1997 October
BACKGROUND: Merkel cell carcinoma is an uncommon malignant tumor of the skin that, after standard surgical excision, tends to recur locally and develop regional nodal spread.
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the use of Mohs micrographic surgery for this aggressive neoplasm.
METHODS: A retrospective study of 86 patients with Merkel cell carcinoma established rates of local persistence and the development of regional metastasis after standard surgical excision. Detailed follow-up was available on a subgroup of 13 patients treated with Mohs surgery.
RESULTS: Standard surgical excision for local disease was associated with high rates of local persistence (13 of 41 [31.7%]) and regional metastasis (20 of 41 [48.8%]). Mean follow-up was 60 months. Mean follow-up for the group treated with Mohs was 36 months. Only one of 12 (8.3%) Mohs-treated patients with histologically confirmed clearance has had local persistence of disease. This patient underwent a second Mohs excision and has remained disease free for 84 months. Regional metastasis developed in four of 12 cases (33.3%). Regional metastasis developed in none of the four patients treated with radiotherapy after Mohs surgery and in four of eight patients treated with Mohs surgery without postoperative radiotherapy.
CONCLUSION: Mohs surgery compares favorably with standard surgical excision. Radiotherapy after Mohs surgery may further reduce persistent metastases in transit and nodal disease.
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the use of Mohs micrographic surgery for this aggressive neoplasm.
METHODS: A retrospective study of 86 patients with Merkel cell carcinoma established rates of local persistence and the development of regional metastasis after standard surgical excision. Detailed follow-up was available on a subgroup of 13 patients treated with Mohs surgery.
RESULTS: Standard surgical excision for local disease was associated with high rates of local persistence (13 of 41 [31.7%]) and regional metastasis (20 of 41 [48.8%]). Mean follow-up was 60 months. Mean follow-up for the group treated with Mohs was 36 months. Only one of 12 (8.3%) Mohs-treated patients with histologically confirmed clearance has had local persistence of disease. This patient underwent a second Mohs excision and has remained disease free for 84 months. Regional metastasis developed in four of 12 cases (33.3%). Regional metastasis developed in none of the four patients treated with radiotherapy after Mohs surgery and in four of eight patients treated with Mohs surgery without postoperative radiotherapy.
CONCLUSION: Mohs surgery compares favorably with standard surgical excision. Radiotherapy after Mohs surgery may further reduce persistent metastases in transit and nodal disease.
Full text links
Trending Papers
Monitoring Macro- and Microcirculation in the Critically Ill: A Narrative Review.Avicenna Journal of Medicine 2023 July
Euglycemic Ketoacidosis in Two Patients Without Diabetes After Introduction of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.Diabetes Care 2023 November 22
ASA Consensus-based Guidance on Preoperative Management of Patients on Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists.Anesthesiology 2023 November 21
Tranexamic Acid for Traumatic Injury in the Emergency Setting: A Systematic Review and Bias-Adjusted Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Annals of Emergency Medicine 2023 November 22
Association between postinduction hypotension and postoperative mortality: a single-centre retrospective cohort study.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2023 November 22
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
Read by QxMD is copyright © 2021 QxMD Software Inc. All rights reserved. By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app