We have located links that may give you full text access.
Radiologic placement of subcutaneous infusion chest ports for long-term central venous access.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology 1997 November
OBJECTIVE: The technical success and complications associated with radiologic placement of subcutaneous implantable chest ports for long-term central venous access were evaluated.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between May 1, 1996, and December 31, 1996, 80 chest ports were placed in 80 consecutive patients using the right internal jugular vein as the preferred access route. All procedures occurred in interventional radiology suites with patients receiving conscious sedation. Both sonography and fluoroscopy were used for venipuncture and to guide port insertion. Follow-up was obtained by the clinical service and by performing chart reviews electronically.
RESULTS: Technical success was 100%, and follow-up was obtained in all patients. One procedural complication occurred that was unrelated to actual catheter placement. Mean catheter use was 155 days (total, 12,168 days; range, 18-303 days). Confirmed catheter-related infection rate was 3%, or 0.016 per 100 access days; symptomatic catheter-related central venous thrombosis rate was 1%, or 0.008 per 100 access days; and 5% of catheters were removed prematurely. No instances of hematoma formation, catheter tip migration or malposition, symptomatic air embolism, spontaneous catheter fracture, or pneumothorax were found.
CONCLUSION: With the benefit of both sonographic and fluoroscopic guidance, subcutaneous implantable chest ports can be inserted by radiologists with equal or lower complication rates than those reported in surgical series. Image-guided insertion of chest ports should replace rather than supplement unguided placement.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between May 1, 1996, and December 31, 1996, 80 chest ports were placed in 80 consecutive patients using the right internal jugular vein as the preferred access route. All procedures occurred in interventional radiology suites with patients receiving conscious sedation. Both sonography and fluoroscopy were used for venipuncture and to guide port insertion. Follow-up was obtained by the clinical service and by performing chart reviews electronically.
RESULTS: Technical success was 100%, and follow-up was obtained in all patients. One procedural complication occurred that was unrelated to actual catheter placement. Mean catheter use was 155 days (total, 12,168 days; range, 18-303 days). Confirmed catheter-related infection rate was 3%, or 0.016 per 100 access days; symptomatic catheter-related central venous thrombosis rate was 1%, or 0.008 per 100 access days; and 5% of catheters were removed prematurely. No instances of hematoma formation, catheter tip migration or malposition, symptomatic air embolism, spontaneous catheter fracture, or pneumothorax were found.
CONCLUSION: With the benefit of both sonographic and fluoroscopic guidance, subcutaneous implantable chest ports can be inserted by radiologists with equal or lower complication rates than those reported in surgical series. Image-guided insertion of chest ports should replace rather than supplement unguided placement.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app