We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Radical transhiatal esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy and endodissection for distal esophageal adenocarcinoma.
World Journal of Surgery 1997 October
Distal adenocarcinoma of the esophagus is defined as a tumor originating from an endobrachyesophagus or a tumor with its main tumor mass (more than two-thirds) located in the distal tubular esophagus. Controversy exists about the optimal mode of surgical resection. Some favor transthoracic esophagectomy, whereas others prefer transhiatal (blunt) esophagectomy. A radical transhiatal esophagectomy (RTE) combined with two-field lymphadenectomy and mediastinoscopic dissection of the upper thoracic esophagus (endodissection) is described herein. We assessed the short- and long-term results of this technique and compared them to a historical group of patients undergoing conventional transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) for adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus. Altogether 124 patients underwent transmediastinal esophagectomy because of adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus in our department between January 1986 and May 1995. Thirteen of these patients were excluded from this analysis because of preoperative chemotherapy. The remaining 109 patients were divided into two groups: 62 patients who underwent THE between January 1986 and March 1991 (51 men, 11 women; mean age 65.3 years, range 31-83 years) and 47 patients who had RTE between April 1991 and May 1995 (44 men, 3 women; mean age 63.4 years, range 41-84 years). To compare the long-term results of RTE and THE, we used a matched-pairs analysis considering tumor stage and age. The hospital (30-day) mortality was marginally lower in the RTE group (4.3% versus 6.4%), resulting in an overall mortality of 5.5%. The rate of pulmonary complications was insignificantly lower in the RTE group [19.1% RTE versus 25.8% THE; not significant (NS), and the rate of postoperative cardiac abnormalities significantly decreased after RTE (2.6% RTE versus 19.3% THE; p < 0.05). The overall rate of R0 resections was 87.2% (82.2% RTE, 87.1% THE). Overall survival was similar within the two study groups. Complete tumor removal, T and N stages, and the lymph node ratio were identified as prognostic factors for long-term survival. Overall survival was better after RTE than after conventional THE in patients with involved lymph nodes. The mean number of resected lymph nodes per patient in the RTE group was 26.7. Positive lymph nodes were most common in the paracardial region and at the lesser curvature (72%/10.8% of all invaded abdominal nodes). In the mediastinum positive nodes were most common in the paraesophageal and paraaortal region (48%/27% of all mediastinal nodes). Patients with positive abdominal and mediastinal lymph nodes had a poor long-term prognosis. Distal adenocarcinoma of the esophagus can be safely resected by RTE with two-field lymphadenectomy and endodissection. This technique allows radical "enbloc" resection of the tumor-bearing distal third of the esophagus, which includes the primary area of lymph node metastasis of adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus: the lower mediastinum and paracardial region. The analysis showed that RTE incurred fewer cardiac complications and a better overall survival in N1-positive patients when compared retrospectively to THE. Intraoperative mediastinoscopy allows controlled dissection of the upper mediastinum and biopsy of several mediastinal lymph nodes, with the advantage of providing additional staging information.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app