We have located links that may give you full text access.
Outcome of infants requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation before extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
Journal of Pediatric Surgery 1997 September
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is reported to be used in a significant number of neonates before initiation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). This report establishes the incidence of infants who require CPR before initiation of ECMO and elucidates survival rates and long-term neurological outcomes. In addition, the authors sought prognostic factors that could reliably predict survival or long-term neurological outcome before initiating ECMO support.
METHODS: The Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) registry provided data on 839 neonates who received CPR before ECMO from January 1989 to April 1995. Supplemental questionnaires on 414 infants were returned from 64 ECMO centers regarding details of the CPR event and subsequent neurological development. One-year neurological evaluations were provided on 112 infants. Data were analyzed for statistical significance using chi2, multiple logistic regression, and Kruskal Wallis one-way analysis of variance as applicable, with significance set at P < .05.
RESULTS: The incidence of infants requiring pre-ECMO CPR was 13.1%. Infants who received pre-ECMO CPR had a survival rate of 60.8% versus 81.6% survival for infants who did not require CPR (P < .00001). Analysis of ELSO registry data showed survival was significantly associated with primary diagnosis, location of CPR, last pH level before ECMO, and the presence of intraventricular hemorrhage. Questionnaire data on 12-month neurological assessment showed 63% had no impairment and 4% were graded as severely impaired. Twelve-month neurological outcome was significantly associated only with primary diagnosis.
CONCLUSION: A survival rate of 60.8% with good neurological outcome at 12 months in 63.4% of infants suggests that CPR alone should not be a contraindication to placing a neonate on ECMO.
METHODS: The Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) registry provided data on 839 neonates who received CPR before ECMO from January 1989 to April 1995. Supplemental questionnaires on 414 infants were returned from 64 ECMO centers regarding details of the CPR event and subsequent neurological development. One-year neurological evaluations were provided on 112 infants. Data were analyzed for statistical significance using chi2, multiple logistic regression, and Kruskal Wallis one-way analysis of variance as applicable, with significance set at P < .05.
RESULTS: The incidence of infants requiring pre-ECMO CPR was 13.1%. Infants who received pre-ECMO CPR had a survival rate of 60.8% versus 81.6% survival for infants who did not require CPR (P < .00001). Analysis of ELSO registry data showed survival was significantly associated with primary diagnosis, location of CPR, last pH level before ECMO, and the presence of intraventricular hemorrhage. Questionnaire data on 12-month neurological assessment showed 63% had no impairment and 4% were graded as severely impaired. Twelve-month neurological outcome was significantly associated only with primary diagnosis.
CONCLUSION: A survival rate of 60.8% with good neurological outcome at 12 months in 63.4% of infants suggests that CPR alone should not be a contraindication to placing a neonate on ECMO.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app