We have located links that may give you full text access.
Clinical Trial
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Vaccine antigen interactions after a combination diphtheria-tetanus toxoid-acellular pertussis/purified capsular polysaccharide of Haemophilus influenzae type b-tetanus toxoid vaccine in two-, four- and six-month-old infants.
Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 1997 September
OBJECTIVE: The safety and immunogenicity of a diphtheria-tetanus toxoid-acellular pertussis vaccine (DTaP; Trepedia)/Haemophilus influenzae b polysaccharide (PRP-T; ActHib) combined vaccine (TriHibir; Pasteur Mérieux Connaught) was compared with DTaP and PRP-T given at the same visit but at separate sites in a prospective multicenter, open label trial.
METHODS: Infants were randomized to four groups (three consistency lots of DTaP/PRP-T vs. one of the consistency lots given as separate vaccines); injections were administered at 2, 4 and 6 months of age. Pre-Dose 1 and post-Dose 3 sera were assayed for antibody titers against all antigens. Reactions to the vaccinations were assessed by parent questionnaire for 30 days after each injection visit.
RESULTS: Four hundred eighty-five infants were enrolled; 296 evaluable infants were included in the DTaP/PRP-T group compared with 70 infants in the DTaP and PRP-T vaccine group. Infants who received the combined vaccine had higher post-Dose 3 geometric mean antibody titers to diphtheria antitoxin (P < 0.01) and pertussis filamentous hemagglutinin (P < 0.05) and lower geometric mean antibody titers to tetanus antitoxin (P < 0.05) and Haemophilus influenzae b (Hib) polysaccharide (PRP) (P < 0.05). The geometric mean anti-PRP antibody titer in the DTaP/PRP-T group was 4.3 micrograms/ml compared with 7.0 micrograms/ml in the separate vaccine group (P < 0.05), and the percentage of infants with antibody titers > or = 0.15 and 1 microgram/ml were, respectively, 95 and 86%, whereas they were 100% for both titers in the separate vaccines group. DTaP/ PRP-T vaccine given concomitantly or 1 month apart from hepatitis B vaccine and oral poliomyelitis vaccine caused no significant differences in immunogenicity or safety. The safety assessments for the DTaP/PRP-T vaccine showed no consistent differences in systemic or local injection site reactions compared with DTaP and PRP-T administered separately.
CONCLUSION: Although the antibody responses to tetanus and Hib polysaccharide in the evaluated DTaP/PRP-T combined vaccine were significantly lower than those seen after separate DTaP and PRP-T administration, the combined vaccine elicited an immune response against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis and Haemophilus influenzae b likely to confer protection.
METHODS: Infants were randomized to four groups (three consistency lots of DTaP/PRP-T vs. one of the consistency lots given as separate vaccines); injections were administered at 2, 4 and 6 months of age. Pre-Dose 1 and post-Dose 3 sera were assayed for antibody titers against all antigens. Reactions to the vaccinations were assessed by parent questionnaire for 30 days after each injection visit.
RESULTS: Four hundred eighty-five infants were enrolled; 296 evaluable infants were included in the DTaP/PRP-T group compared with 70 infants in the DTaP and PRP-T vaccine group. Infants who received the combined vaccine had higher post-Dose 3 geometric mean antibody titers to diphtheria antitoxin (P < 0.01) and pertussis filamentous hemagglutinin (P < 0.05) and lower geometric mean antibody titers to tetanus antitoxin (P < 0.05) and Haemophilus influenzae b (Hib) polysaccharide (PRP) (P < 0.05). The geometric mean anti-PRP antibody titer in the DTaP/PRP-T group was 4.3 micrograms/ml compared with 7.0 micrograms/ml in the separate vaccine group (P < 0.05), and the percentage of infants with antibody titers > or = 0.15 and 1 microgram/ml were, respectively, 95 and 86%, whereas they were 100% for both titers in the separate vaccines group. DTaP/ PRP-T vaccine given concomitantly or 1 month apart from hepatitis B vaccine and oral poliomyelitis vaccine caused no significant differences in immunogenicity or safety. The safety assessments for the DTaP/PRP-T vaccine showed no consistent differences in systemic or local injection site reactions compared with DTaP and PRP-T administered separately.
CONCLUSION: Although the antibody responses to tetanus and Hib polysaccharide in the evaluated DTaP/PRP-T combined vaccine were significantly lower than those seen after separate DTaP and PRP-T administration, the combined vaccine elicited an immune response against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis and Haemophilus influenzae b likely to confer protection.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app