We have located links that may give you full text access.
Pelvic exenteration: effects of surgery on quality of life and body image--a prospective longitudinal study.
Gynecologic Oncology 1997 September
OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to evaluate the impact of reconstructive and nonreconstructive surgical procedures on quality of life and body image for women who undergo pelvic exenteration.
METHODS: Twenty-eight patients were assessed in a prospective study with a preoperative semistructured interview and an objective assessment (T1). Interviews and questionnaires were repeated 4 (T2) and 12 (T3) months postoperatively. The women were divided into groups with two, one, or no ostomies. A separate comparison was made of women with and without vaginal capacity. Quality of life was defined in terms of five categories according to the definition of health proposed by the World Health Organization: physical and psychosocial health; marital and sexual status; medical interactions.
RESULTS: At all points in time, the patients' quality of life was affected most significantly by worries about the progression of the tumor. Twelve months postoperatively, patients with two ostomies reported a significantly lower quality of life (P = 0.008) and poorer body image (P = 0.002) than patients with no ostomy. At T3, patients with vaginal capacity reported fewer problems in all categories related to quality of life and significantly (P = 0.015) fewer sexual problems.
CONCLUSION: An evaluation of quality of life and body image demonstrates the benefits of newer techniques for organ reconstruction. Thus, organ reconstruction should be performed whenever possible in patients with pelvic exenteration.
METHODS: Twenty-eight patients were assessed in a prospective study with a preoperative semistructured interview and an objective assessment (T1). Interviews and questionnaires were repeated 4 (T2) and 12 (T3) months postoperatively. The women were divided into groups with two, one, or no ostomies. A separate comparison was made of women with and without vaginal capacity. Quality of life was defined in terms of five categories according to the definition of health proposed by the World Health Organization: physical and psychosocial health; marital and sexual status; medical interactions.
RESULTS: At all points in time, the patients' quality of life was affected most significantly by worries about the progression of the tumor. Twelve months postoperatively, patients with two ostomies reported a significantly lower quality of life (P = 0.008) and poorer body image (P = 0.002) than patients with no ostomy. At T3, patients with vaginal capacity reported fewer problems in all categories related to quality of life and significantly (P = 0.015) fewer sexual problems.
CONCLUSION: An evaluation of quality of life and body image demonstrates the benefits of newer techniques for organ reconstruction. Thus, organ reconstruction should be performed whenever possible in patients with pelvic exenteration.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app