We have located links that may give you full text access.
Should obese patients lose weight before receiving a kidney transplant?
Transplantation 1997 August 28
BACKGROUND: The results of renal transplantation in obese recipients have been controversial, with some reports finding increased morbidity prohibitive and others finding increased morbidity acceptable. We attempted to determine whether obese patients in extreme excess of their ideal body weight should undergo transplantation.
METHODS: The study population included 127 obese (body mass index >30 kg/m2) patients who were compared with a matched nonobese control group (body mass index <27 kg/m2) of 127 recipients with similar demographics. There were no significant differences between the groups according to donor source, recipient race or sex, retransplants, transplant percent reactive antibodies, cause of renal failure, or hypertension. However, significantly more obese patients had a pretransplant history of angina (11.2% vs. 3.2%, P=0.02) or a previous myocardial infarction (5.6% vs. 0.8%, P=0.04).
RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 58.9+/-40 (range 3-170) months. Nonobese patients enjoyed a significantly (P=0.0002) greater patient survival (89% vs. 67%) at 5 years and suffered only about half the number of deaths (25 vs. 46) during the period of observation. Cardiac disease was the leading cause of death (39.1%) in the obese group. Patient death had a major impact on graft survival because there were no differences between the groups when death with graft function was censored from the analysis. There were no significant differences between the groups in delayed graft function, acute rejection, chronic rejection, length of hospital stay, operative blood loss, or mean serum creatinine up to 5 years. However, obese patients experienced significantly (P=0.0001) more complications per patient (3.3 vs. 2.2) and a greater incidence (P=0.0003) of posttransplant diabetes (12% vs. 2%). Similar cyclosporine blood levels were observed in obese recipients even though they were receiving 0.75-2 mg/kg/day less cyclosporine than the nonobese recipients.
CONCLUSIONS: Outcome differences in obese renal transplant patients were primarily due to a higher mortality resulting from cardiac events. Obesity seems to have little effect on immunologic events, long-term graft function, or cyclosporine delivery. Aggressive pretransplant screening for ischemic heart disease is essential to identify an especially high-risk subgroup of obese patients. Although it would seem prudent to recommend weight reduction <30 kg/m2 to all patients before transplant, these data suggest that obese patients with a history of cardiac disease should not be transplanted until weight reduction has been accomplished.
METHODS: The study population included 127 obese (body mass index >30 kg/m2) patients who were compared with a matched nonobese control group (body mass index <27 kg/m2) of 127 recipients with similar demographics. There were no significant differences between the groups according to donor source, recipient race or sex, retransplants, transplant percent reactive antibodies, cause of renal failure, or hypertension. However, significantly more obese patients had a pretransplant history of angina (11.2% vs. 3.2%, P=0.02) or a previous myocardial infarction (5.6% vs. 0.8%, P=0.04).
RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 58.9+/-40 (range 3-170) months. Nonobese patients enjoyed a significantly (P=0.0002) greater patient survival (89% vs. 67%) at 5 years and suffered only about half the number of deaths (25 vs. 46) during the period of observation. Cardiac disease was the leading cause of death (39.1%) in the obese group. Patient death had a major impact on graft survival because there were no differences between the groups when death with graft function was censored from the analysis. There were no significant differences between the groups in delayed graft function, acute rejection, chronic rejection, length of hospital stay, operative blood loss, or mean serum creatinine up to 5 years. However, obese patients experienced significantly (P=0.0001) more complications per patient (3.3 vs. 2.2) and a greater incidence (P=0.0003) of posttransplant diabetes (12% vs. 2%). Similar cyclosporine blood levels were observed in obese recipients even though they were receiving 0.75-2 mg/kg/day less cyclosporine than the nonobese recipients.
CONCLUSIONS: Outcome differences in obese renal transplant patients were primarily due to a higher mortality resulting from cardiac events. Obesity seems to have little effect on immunologic events, long-term graft function, or cyclosporine delivery. Aggressive pretransplant screening for ischemic heart disease is essential to identify an especially high-risk subgroup of obese patients. Although it would seem prudent to recommend weight reduction <30 kg/m2 to all patients before transplant, these data suggest that obese patients with a history of cardiac disease should not be transplanted until weight reduction has been accomplished.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app