COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Effect of a screening profile on the diagnosis of nonaccidental burns in children.
Pediatric Emergency Care 1997 August
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine if awareness of factors associated with burn abuse increases recognition and reporting by emergency physicians.
DESIGN: The study consisted of a retrospective chart review and a subsequent intervention.
SETTING: An urban pediatric emergency department (ED).
PARTICIPANTS: All patients with the diagnosis of burn seen in the ED.
INTERVENTION: The retrospective chart review (October 1, 1990, to September 30, 1991) determined the number of patients seen in the ED, diagnosed with burns, and reported to the department of social service. We then determined whether or not the department of social service, after completion of their investigation, "verified" that abuse had occurred. In addition, other services provided to the family by the department of social services were determined. The prospective study (April 1, 1992, to March 30, 1993) introduced a checklist of 13 factors associated with abusive burns into the history and physical examination of all burn victims presenting to the ED. Changes in overall referrals to the department of social service as well as in the numbers of cases in which abuse were verified or services offered were then determined.
RESULTS: Prior to any intervention, 3% (3/87) of burns presenting to the ED from 1990 to 1991 were reported to the department of social service. This contrasted with 12.1% (26/215) of burns presenting after introduction of the checklist. Burn victims, 1/87 (1%), in the retrospective study and 16/215 (7.4%) burn victims in the prospective study received social service intervention after a report was initiated by the ED staff (P < .002). Burn injuries 1/87 (1%) and 7/215 (3.3%), reported during the two studies were substantiated as abusive by social services.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that the use of the checklist increased effective social service referral for burn abuse.
DESIGN: The study consisted of a retrospective chart review and a subsequent intervention.
SETTING: An urban pediatric emergency department (ED).
PARTICIPANTS: All patients with the diagnosis of burn seen in the ED.
INTERVENTION: The retrospective chart review (October 1, 1990, to September 30, 1991) determined the number of patients seen in the ED, diagnosed with burns, and reported to the department of social service. We then determined whether or not the department of social service, after completion of their investigation, "verified" that abuse had occurred. In addition, other services provided to the family by the department of social services were determined. The prospective study (April 1, 1992, to March 30, 1993) introduced a checklist of 13 factors associated with abusive burns into the history and physical examination of all burn victims presenting to the ED. Changes in overall referrals to the department of social service as well as in the numbers of cases in which abuse were verified or services offered were then determined.
RESULTS: Prior to any intervention, 3% (3/87) of burns presenting to the ED from 1990 to 1991 were reported to the department of social service. This contrasted with 12.1% (26/215) of burns presenting after introduction of the checklist. Burn victims, 1/87 (1%), in the retrospective study and 16/215 (7.4%) burn victims in the prospective study received social service intervention after a report was initiated by the ED staff (P < .002). Burn injuries 1/87 (1%) and 7/215 (3.3%), reported during the two studies were substantiated as abusive by social services.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that the use of the checklist increased effective social service referral for burn abuse.
Full text links
Trending Papers
Bacteremia with gram positive bacteria - when and how do I need to look for endocarditis?Clinical Microbiology and Infection 2023 August 32
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
Read by QxMD is copyright © 2021 QxMD Software Inc. All rights reserved. By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app