COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Comparison of a high power diode laser with the Nd:YAG laser using in situ wound strength analysis of healing cutaneous incisions.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The laser-tissue interaction of a high power semiconductor diode laser was compared to the continuous wave neodymium yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser by evaluating primary wound healing of cutaneous incisions in rats.

STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: Full thickness incisions were made in rat skin using a diode laser (805 nm, 10 W, contact mode), an Nd:YAG laser (1,064 nm, 10 W, contact mode), and a stainless steel scalpel blade (control). In situ wound breaking strength measurements were obtained at 7, 14, and 21 days using a specially designed tensiometer. Cross sectional area of non-disrupted wounds was calculated in two groups prior to testing to allow for calculation of tensile strength. Blinded histopathologic analysis was also performed.

RESULTS: Analysis of variance (P < or = 0.05) was used to determine differences in breaking strengths and tensile strengths due to incision method. There was no significant difference in the breaking strengths (group 1) or tensile strengths (groups 2 and 3) of the diode and Nd:YAG laser incisions. As predicted, breaking strengths and tensile strengths of scalpel blade incisions were significantly greater than those of incisions made with laser energy. Histopathologic evaluation revealed that through day 14, the degree of inflammation and collagen production was similar for diode and Nd:YAG laser incisions. Laser incisions had greater inflammation and a lag in fibroblast invasion and collagen production compared with scalpel incisions. By day 21, all incisions were similar in fibroblast population and collagen production, but laser incisions had slightly more inflammation than scalpel incisions.

CONCLUSION: In the primary wound healing model described, the tissue effect, cellular response, and development of wound strength were essentially the same for the high power diode laser at 10 W and the Nd:YAG laser at 10 W.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app