We have located links that may give you full text access.
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Noninvasive ventilation in acute respiratory insufficiency].
Medizinische Klinik 1997 April 29
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) via face mask offers in comparison to endotracheal intubation in treating patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) advantages like allowing swallowing and coughing. We report our experiences and try to verify the indications and the efficacy of NPPV.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the period of January 1991 until August 1996 109 patients (30 female, 79 male, mean age 61 +/- 12 years) received mechanical ventilation with NPPV representing 25% of all MVs in this term. As baseline capillary blood gases (CBG) were found: pH: 7.30 +/- 0, 10; pCO2: 64 +/- 19; pO2: 60 +/- 19 (all patients received supplemental oxygen). Success of NPPV was determined by an improvement of the baseline CBG.
RESULTS: NPPV was successful in 77 (71%) patients. Considering the kind of respiratory insufficiency the patient population was divided into 4 groups 1. acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, 2. acute hypercapnic ventilatory failure, 3. acute decompensation of chronic respiratory insufficiency (CRI) and 4. combined failure. Considering these subgroups we obtained the best results in the group of patients with hypercapnic disturbances. In patients with hypoxemic RF we observed a success of NPPV if the improvement of CBG occurred in the early stage (< or = 12 hours) of NPPV.
CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that application of NPPV is an effective and safe alternative to endotracheal intubation in many patients with hypercapnic ventilatory failure. NPPV is also successful in patients with hypoxemic RF with a milder course.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the period of January 1991 until August 1996 109 patients (30 female, 79 male, mean age 61 +/- 12 years) received mechanical ventilation with NPPV representing 25% of all MVs in this term. As baseline capillary blood gases (CBG) were found: pH: 7.30 +/- 0, 10; pCO2: 64 +/- 19; pO2: 60 +/- 19 (all patients received supplemental oxygen). Success of NPPV was determined by an improvement of the baseline CBG.
RESULTS: NPPV was successful in 77 (71%) patients. Considering the kind of respiratory insufficiency the patient population was divided into 4 groups 1. acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, 2. acute hypercapnic ventilatory failure, 3. acute decompensation of chronic respiratory insufficiency (CRI) and 4. combined failure. Considering these subgroups we obtained the best results in the group of patients with hypercapnic disturbances. In patients with hypoxemic RF we observed a success of NPPV if the improvement of CBG occurred in the early stage (< or = 12 hours) of NPPV.
CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that application of NPPV is an effective and safe alternative to endotracheal intubation in many patients with hypercapnic ventilatory failure. NPPV is also successful in patients with hypoxemic RF with a milder course.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app