We have located links that may give you full text access.
Endoscopic ultrasonography assessment in preoperative staging for carcinoma of ampulla of Vater and extrahepatic bile duct.
Chinese Medical Journal 1996 August
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate preoperatively the extent of primary tumor, involvement of regional lymph node, and distant metastasis of ampullary carcinoma and extra hepatic bile duct carcinoma.
METHODS: 28 patients with ampullary carcinoma and the 18 patients with extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma were subjected to endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). The results were compared with those of surgical explorations and pathological findings of the resected specimens for evaluating the accuracy of preoperative staging of EUS. 46 patients underwent surgical explorations. Radical resection with detailed pathological study was done for 22 patients with resectable ampullary carcinoma and 18 patients with extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma. Carcinomas of ampulla of Vater and extrahepatic bile duct were staged according to the tumor, nodes, metastasis (TNM) classification.
RESULTS: The accurate rate of EUS in assessing the extent of cancer invasion was 81.8% for ampullary carcinoma, and 72.2% for extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma. The accuracy of EUS in predicting regional lymph node metastasis was 59% for ampullary carcinoma, and 61.1% for extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma. Invasion of portal vein was correctly predicted by EUS in 2 of 3 patients, but the 3 cases of liver metastasis were not detected by EUS.
CONCLUSIONS: EUS is an effective method for the evaluation of the extent of invasion of ampullary carcinoma and extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma as well as the involvement of regional lymph node before operation. Because of its limited penetration depth, however, EUS is inadequate in the assessment of liver metastasis.
METHODS: 28 patients with ampullary carcinoma and the 18 patients with extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma were subjected to endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). The results were compared with those of surgical explorations and pathological findings of the resected specimens for evaluating the accuracy of preoperative staging of EUS. 46 patients underwent surgical explorations. Radical resection with detailed pathological study was done for 22 patients with resectable ampullary carcinoma and 18 patients with extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma. Carcinomas of ampulla of Vater and extrahepatic bile duct were staged according to the tumor, nodes, metastasis (TNM) classification.
RESULTS: The accurate rate of EUS in assessing the extent of cancer invasion was 81.8% for ampullary carcinoma, and 72.2% for extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma. The accuracy of EUS in predicting regional lymph node metastasis was 59% for ampullary carcinoma, and 61.1% for extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma. Invasion of portal vein was correctly predicted by EUS in 2 of 3 patients, but the 3 cases of liver metastasis were not detected by EUS.
CONCLUSIONS: EUS is an effective method for the evaluation of the extent of invasion of ampullary carcinoma and extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma as well as the involvement of regional lymph node before operation. Because of its limited penetration depth, however, EUS is inadequate in the assessment of liver metastasis.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app