We have located links that may give you full text access.
Out-of-hospital experience with the syringe esophageal detector device.
Academic Emergency Medicine 1997 June
OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of a syringe esophageal detector device (EDD) for detecting esophageal intubations in an out-of-hospital setting.
METHODS: Prospective, observational study of adult (age > or = 18 years) patients intubated by paramedics from October 1993 through May 1994 in an urban emergency medical services (EMS) system. Paramedics were instructed to record the EDD reading after endotracheal tube placement. However, paramedics were instructed not to modify their tube locations based on the EDD reading. Tube placement was evaluated by a physician upon patient arrival at a local ED.
RESULTS: Paramedics performed 374 intubations during the study period, and in 213, the EDD was used. Of these 213 patients, 45 were excluded from analysis (32-tube placement not confirmed, 11-paramedic uncertain of EDD reading, 2-too young). In the remaining 168 intubations, the EDD correctly identified 5 of 10 esophageal intubations (sensitivity 50%; 95% CI: 19%, 81%). The EDD correctly identified 156 of 158 tracheal intubations (specificity 99%; 95% CI: 96%, 100%).
CONCLUSIONS: In this paramedic field study, the EDD demonstrated poor sensitivity for esophageal intubations. Further EMS studies of the EDD are needed to clarify the value of the device in out-of-hospital emergent clinical intubations.
METHODS: Prospective, observational study of adult (age > or = 18 years) patients intubated by paramedics from October 1993 through May 1994 in an urban emergency medical services (EMS) system. Paramedics were instructed to record the EDD reading after endotracheal tube placement. However, paramedics were instructed not to modify their tube locations based on the EDD reading. Tube placement was evaluated by a physician upon patient arrival at a local ED.
RESULTS: Paramedics performed 374 intubations during the study period, and in 213, the EDD was used. Of these 213 patients, 45 were excluded from analysis (32-tube placement not confirmed, 11-paramedic uncertain of EDD reading, 2-too young). In the remaining 168 intubations, the EDD correctly identified 5 of 10 esophageal intubations (sensitivity 50%; 95% CI: 19%, 81%). The EDD correctly identified 156 of 158 tracheal intubations (specificity 99%; 95% CI: 96%, 100%).
CONCLUSIONS: In this paramedic field study, the EDD demonstrated poor sensitivity for esophageal intubations. Further EMS studies of the EDD are needed to clarify the value of the device in out-of-hospital emergent clinical intubations.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app