We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Diagnosis of pleural effusion in intensive care patients with supine digital thoracic imaging. A study of CT validated cases].
PURPOSE: The significance of the recumbent chest x-ray using digital luminescence radiography was to be assessed in respect of diagnosis of pleural effusions.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three experienced radiologists evaluated 32 digital recumbent chest x-rays of 32 intensive-care patients. The radiologists were asked to estimate the effusion volume and to assess whether typical x-ray signs of pleural effusions were seen. These evaluations were compared with one another and with the simultaneously produced CTs.
RESULTS: Diagnostic accuracy of the digital recumbent chest x-ray is of medium quality in respect of diagnosis of pleural effusions (sensitivity: 69%, specificity: 54%, positive predictive value: 81%, negative predictive value: 34%, rate of accuracy: 65%). Diagnostic safety is the same for right-sided or left-sided pleural effusions, and increases with increasing effusion volume. The ratings by the radiologists are statistically not significantly different, but are significantly different from the CT measurements (Wilcoxon test, p < 0.05). Correlations of the assessments and the measurements were weakly positive (r = 0.24, r = 0.36, r = 0.47). The pleural effusions were on the average underestimated by the radiologists. The median predictive error was 203 ml.
CONCLUSIONS: Recumbent chest x-ray with digital luminescence radiography is an imaging method of limited accuracy in respect of diagnosis of pleural effusions. Supplementary diagnostic methods are recommended, as the present results show, especially in such cases where the recumbent chest x-ray does not reveal an effusion or if the volume must be determined accurately. Digital recumbent chest x-ray ranks equal with conventional x-ray in the diagnosis of pleural effusions.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three experienced radiologists evaluated 32 digital recumbent chest x-rays of 32 intensive-care patients. The radiologists were asked to estimate the effusion volume and to assess whether typical x-ray signs of pleural effusions were seen. These evaluations were compared with one another and with the simultaneously produced CTs.
RESULTS: Diagnostic accuracy of the digital recumbent chest x-ray is of medium quality in respect of diagnosis of pleural effusions (sensitivity: 69%, specificity: 54%, positive predictive value: 81%, negative predictive value: 34%, rate of accuracy: 65%). Diagnostic safety is the same for right-sided or left-sided pleural effusions, and increases with increasing effusion volume. The ratings by the radiologists are statistically not significantly different, but are significantly different from the CT measurements (Wilcoxon test, p < 0.05). Correlations of the assessments and the measurements were weakly positive (r = 0.24, r = 0.36, r = 0.47). The pleural effusions were on the average underestimated by the radiologists. The median predictive error was 203 ml.
CONCLUSIONS: Recumbent chest x-ray with digital luminescence radiography is an imaging method of limited accuracy in respect of diagnosis of pleural effusions. Supplementary diagnostic methods are recommended, as the present results show, especially in such cases where the recumbent chest x-ray does not reveal an effusion or if the volume must be determined accurately. Digital recumbent chest x-ray ranks equal with conventional x-ray in the diagnosis of pleural effusions.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app