We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Balance characteristics of persons with osteoporosis.
OBJECTIVE: People affected by osteoporosis are at particular risk for bone fractures caused by falls. Preventive intervention depends on first describing the risk factors for falls present in this population as a group and as individuals. In this preliminary study, balance characteristics of women with and without osteoporosis were measured with computerized dynamic posturography (CDP).
DESIGN: A case control design was selected to compare the balance characteristics of each group of patients with osteoporosis.
SETTING: Testing was performed in the vestibular assessment area of our multispecialty clinic.
SUBJECTS: Patient groups were selected from within our case load. Ten women with osteoporosis were compared with six women with osteoporosis and kyphosis (Cobb angle more than 54 degrees) and with five age-matched normal subjects.
INTERVENTIONS: Because this was an observational study, no interventions were used.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Averaged results from all trials of sensory organization tests 5 and 6, with use of sway amplitude and balance strategy scores, were used to compare the performance of each patient group.
RESULTS: Both groups with osteoporosis had different balance control strategies than the group without osteoporosis. Specifically, those with osteoporosis had greater use of hip strategies for maintaining balance than did the normal group. Those with kyphosis also had greater postural sway than either of the other two groups.
CONCLUSION: Results of this study suggest that there are differences in balance control strategies and sway amplitude between patients with and those without osteoporosis. Further study is recommended in which CDP is used to clarify and confirm these differences. Individual CDP results can be used to optimize habilitative management of these patients.
DESIGN: A case control design was selected to compare the balance characteristics of each group of patients with osteoporosis.
SETTING: Testing was performed in the vestibular assessment area of our multispecialty clinic.
SUBJECTS: Patient groups were selected from within our case load. Ten women with osteoporosis were compared with six women with osteoporosis and kyphosis (Cobb angle more than 54 degrees) and with five age-matched normal subjects.
INTERVENTIONS: Because this was an observational study, no interventions were used.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Averaged results from all trials of sensory organization tests 5 and 6, with use of sway amplitude and balance strategy scores, were used to compare the performance of each patient group.
RESULTS: Both groups with osteoporosis had different balance control strategies than the group without osteoporosis. Specifically, those with osteoporosis had greater use of hip strategies for maintaining balance than did the normal group. Those with kyphosis also had greater postural sway than either of the other two groups.
CONCLUSION: Results of this study suggest that there are differences in balance control strategies and sway amplitude between patients with and those without osteoporosis. Further study is recommended in which CDP is used to clarify and confirm these differences. Individual CDP results can be used to optimize habilitative management of these patients.
Full text links
Trending Papers
Monitoring Macro- and Microcirculation in the Critically Ill: A Narrative Review.Avicenna Journal of Medicine 2023 July
ASA Consensus-based Guidance on Preoperative Management of Patients on Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists.Anesthesiology 2023 November 21
Common postbariatric surgery emergencies for the acute care surgeon: What you need to know.Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 2023 December 2
Sodium bicarbonate Ringer's solution for hemorrhagic shock: A meta-analysis comparing crystalloid solutions.American Journal of Emergency Medicine 2023 November 6
Association between postinduction hypotension and postoperative mortality: a single-centre retrospective cohort study.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2023 November 22
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
Read by QxMD is copyright © 2021 QxMD Software Inc. All rights reserved. By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app