We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Prospective long-term endoscopic and histological follow-up of short segment Barrett's esophagus: comparison with traditional long segment Barrett's esophagus.
American Journal of Gastroenterology 1997 March
OBJECTIVES: Barrett's esophagus is associated with adenocarcinoma of the cardia and esophagus, regardless of its extent. The aim of this study was to compare the prevalence and incidence of dysplasia and adenocarcinoma in short segment and traditional long segment Barrett's esophagus.
METHODS: Seventy-four patients with short segment Barrett's and 78 with traditional Barrett's entered the study.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age or gender between the two groups of patients with Barrett's esophagus. A greater percentage of patients with short segment barrett's were black (p = 0.04). The prevalence of dysplasia at diagnosis in patients with short segment Barrett's was 8.1% versus 24.4% in patients with traditional Barrett's (p < 0.007). Adenocarcinoma was noted at diagnosis only in patients with traditional Barrett's (p < 0.0005). Twenty-six patients with short segment Barrett's and 29 with traditional Barrett's were followed prospectively for 12-40 months. Dysplasia developed during follow-up in two patients with short segment Barrett's and in six patients with traditional Barrett's (p < 0.05). Neither high grade dysplasia nor cancer developed in any patients with short segment Barrett's. High grade dysplasia did develop in two patients with traditional Barrett's esophagus, and mucosal adenocarcinoma developed in one. The frequency of dysplasia on the latest surveillance examination continued to be significantly higher for patients with traditional Barrett's (p = 0.03). Follow-up surveillance biopsy specimens of Barrett's mucosa frequently demonstrated an absence of goblet cells in patients with short segment Barrett's compared with patients with traditional Barrett's (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of dysplasia or adenocarcinoma and the incidence of dysplasia in patients with traditional Barrett's esophagus are significantly higher than in patients with short segment Barrett's esophagus. Further prospective surveillance is required to determine whether the incidence of adenocarcinoma in patients with short segment Barrett's esophagus is significantly lower.
METHODS: Seventy-four patients with short segment Barrett's and 78 with traditional Barrett's entered the study.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age or gender between the two groups of patients with Barrett's esophagus. A greater percentage of patients with short segment barrett's were black (p = 0.04). The prevalence of dysplasia at diagnosis in patients with short segment Barrett's was 8.1% versus 24.4% in patients with traditional Barrett's (p < 0.007). Adenocarcinoma was noted at diagnosis only in patients with traditional Barrett's (p < 0.0005). Twenty-six patients with short segment Barrett's and 29 with traditional Barrett's were followed prospectively for 12-40 months. Dysplasia developed during follow-up in two patients with short segment Barrett's and in six patients with traditional Barrett's (p < 0.05). Neither high grade dysplasia nor cancer developed in any patients with short segment Barrett's. High grade dysplasia did develop in two patients with traditional Barrett's esophagus, and mucosal adenocarcinoma developed in one. The frequency of dysplasia on the latest surveillance examination continued to be significantly higher for patients with traditional Barrett's (p = 0.03). Follow-up surveillance biopsy specimens of Barrett's mucosa frequently demonstrated an absence of goblet cells in patients with short segment Barrett's compared with patients with traditional Barrett's (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of dysplasia or adenocarcinoma and the incidence of dysplasia in patients with traditional Barrett's esophagus are significantly higher than in patients with short segment Barrett's esophagus. Further prospective surveillance is required to determine whether the incidence of adenocarcinoma in patients with short segment Barrett's esophagus is significantly lower.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app