We have located links that may give you full text access.
Sonography of normal cranial sutures.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology 1997 March
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe the normal sonographic appearance and measurement of normal major cranial sutures in neonates and infants.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: High-resolution sonograms of sagittal, coronal, and lambdoid sutures were obtained for two autopsy specimens and correlated with histologic sections obtained at identical locations. Also, 50 neonates and infants (0-5 months old [corrected age]) who had normally shaped craniums underwent sonography of the brain that produced normal findings. These neonates and infants also underwent sutural sonograms. The width and thickness of each of the major cranial sutures (sagittal, coronal, and lambdoid) were measured, with mean values established. Measurements were analyzed with paired t tests for interobserver variability. Linear regression was used for correlation of measurements with age.
RESULTS: With a scan plane perpendicular to the suture line, sonograms revealed sutures as hypoechoic gaps between two hyperechoic bony plates. On sonograms, sagittal sutures had an end-to-end appearance instead of the beveled junction seen throughout most of the coronal and lambdoid sutures. In the 50 patients, sonograms revealed the mean width to be 0.89 +/- 0.35 mm (mean +/- SD) for coronal sutures. 0.93 +/- 0.28 mm for sagittal sutures, and 0.96 +/- 0.39 mm for lambdoid sutures. On sonograms, mean thickness was 1.97 +/- 0.54 mm for coronal sutures, 1.88 +/- 0.56 mm for sagittal sutures, and 2.49 +/- 0.86 mm for lambdoid sutures. We found no interobserver variability (p < or = .05). With linear regression analysis, we found no correlation between suture width or thickness and patient age (r = .01).
CONCLUSION: In our study, high-resolution sonography proved to be a reliable and inexpensive technique capable of defining cranial sutures. Preliminary normative data obtained for cranial suture width and thickness showed no correlation with age in our population group. The normative data obtained will allow recognition of abnormal sutures, particularly synostotic or diastatic sutures.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: High-resolution sonograms of sagittal, coronal, and lambdoid sutures were obtained for two autopsy specimens and correlated with histologic sections obtained at identical locations. Also, 50 neonates and infants (0-5 months old [corrected age]) who had normally shaped craniums underwent sonography of the brain that produced normal findings. These neonates and infants also underwent sutural sonograms. The width and thickness of each of the major cranial sutures (sagittal, coronal, and lambdoid) were measured, with mean values established. Measurements were analyzed with paired t tests for interobserver variability. Linear regression was used for correlation of measurements with age.
RESULTS: With a scan plane perpendicular to the suture line, sonograms revealed sutures as hypoechoic gaps between two hyperechoic bony plates. On sonograms, sagittal sutures had an end-to-end appearance instead of the beveled junction seen throughout most of the coronal and lambdoid sutures. In the 50 patients, sonograms revealed the mean width to be 0.89 +/- 0.35 mm (mean +/- SD) for coronal sutures. 0.93 +/- 0.28 mm for sagittal sutures, and 0.96 +/- 0.39 mm for lambdoid sutures. On sonograms, mean thickness was 1.97 +/- 0.54 mm for coronal sutures, 1.88 +/- 0.56 mm for sagittal sutures, and 2.49 +/- 0.86 mm for lambdoid sutures. We found no interobserver variability (p < or = .05). With linear regression analysis, we found no correlation between suture width or thickness and patient age (r = .01).
CONCLUSION: In our study, high-resolution sonography proved to be a reliable and inexpensive technique capable of defining cranial sutures. Preliminary normative data obtained for cranial suture width and thickness showed no correlation with age in our population group. The normative data obtained will allow recognition of abnormal sutures, particularly synostotic or diastatic sutures.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app