COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

A comparison of the efficacy of pyloromyotomy and pyloroplasty in patients with gastroesophageal reflux and delayed gastric emptying.

PURPOSE: Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) in children with gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is often treated with a gastric emptying procedure. Although pyloroplasty is the most common gastric emptying procedure performed, pyloromyotomy is easier to perform and is associated with less morbidity. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of pyloromyotomy and pyloroplasty in children with DGE and GER undergoing a fundoplication.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the charts of 54 patients with DGE who underwent pyloromyotomy (n = 29), or pyloroplasty (n = 25) along with a fundoplication. A technetium 99-labeled sulfur colloid liquid-phase gastric emptying study (GES) was performed in the pre- and early postoperative period (within 6 months after operation). Normal stomach emptying was defined as greater than 40% at 1 hour. Comparisons were made with regard to postoperative complication rate, incidence of redo fundoplication, length of postoperative hospital stay, and pre- and postoperative GES.

RESULTS: The pyloroplasty and pyloromyotomy group were comparable in terms of age, sex, operative indications, and neurological status. There was no significant difference in the GES between the two groups preoperatively. There was a trend toward a decreased incidence of early postoperative complications including gas bloat, wound infection, pneumonia, dysphagia, bowel obstruction and dumping syndrome in the pyloromyotomy (8, 28%) when compared with the pyloroplasty group (12, 48%, P = .10). The mean postoperative hospital stay was 10.6 +/- 1.4 days for the pyloroplasty group and 7.6 +/- 1.0 days for the pyloromyotomy group (P + .08). The incidence of a redo fundoplication was 8% in the pyloroplasty and 7% in the pyloromyotomy group. Postoperative gastric emptying increased significantly in both groups (pyloroplasty group, from 18.1 +/- 3.1 to 49.5 +/- 7.9%, P = .0005; pyloromyotomy group, from 19.3 +/- 2.1 to 41.2 +/- 3.7%, P = .0001). There was no significant difference in the postoperative GES between the two groups (P = .289).

CONCLUSION: Both pyloroplasty and pyloromyotomy performed in conjunction with a fundoplication resulted in a significant increase in early postoperative gastric emptying. There was no advantage of pyloroplasty over pyloromyotomy during this follow-up period. These data suggest that pyloromyotomy is an effective gastric emptying procedure in children with GER and DGE.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app