We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Comparative diagnostic accuracy of Tl-201 and Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT imaging (perfusion and ECG-gated SPECT) in detecting coronary artery disease in women.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology 1997 January
OBJECTIVES: This prospective study was conducted in 115 women to directly compare the sensitivity and specificity of thallium-201 (Tl-201), technetium-99m (Tc-99m) sestamibi perfusion and Tc-99m sestamibi electrocardiographic (ECG)-gated single-photon emission computed tomographic (SPECT) studies for detection of coronary artery disease (CAD).
BACKGROUND: Data on the comparative diagnostic accuracy of Tl-201 and Tc-99m sestamibi perfusion imaging for the detection of CAD, specifically in women, are very limited.
METHODS: Eighty-five patients with suspected CAD, scheduled for coronary angiography, and 30 volunteers with a pretest likelihood of < or = 5% for CAD were evaluated. Within 1 week, each patient underwent Tl-201 and Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT imaging procedures (both perfusion and gated SPECT imaging). Treadmill stress testing was used in 78 patients and dipyridamole in the remaining 37 patients. All images were interpreted by three observers in a blinded manner (consensus reading). Technetium-99m sestamibi SPECT studies were read without and then with ECG gating. Technetium-99m sestamibi gated SPECT studies were used to differentiate scar tissue from soft tissue attenuation artifact.
RESULTS: The overall sensitivities for detecting > or = 50% and > or = 70% stenoses were 75.0% and 84.3%, respectively, for Tl-201, and 71.9% and 80.4%, respectively, for Tc-99m sestamibi perfusion studies (p = 0.48). The specificity for lesions > or = 50% was 61.9% for Tl-201 and 85.7% for Tc-99m sestamibi perfusion (p = 0.07), whereas for lesions > or = 70% it was 58.8% for Tl-201 and 82.4% for Tc-99m sestamibi perfusion (p = 0.01). When the 34 patients with a normal coronary angiogram were added to the group of 30 normal volunteers, the "specificity" for lesions > or = 70% was 67.2% for Tl-201, 84.4% for Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT perfusion (p = 0.02) and 92.2% for Tc-99m sestamibi gated SPECT (p = 0.0004).
CONCLUSIONS: Both Tl-201 SPECT and Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT perfusion studies had a similar sensitivity for the detection of CAD in women. However, Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT perfusion imaging shows a significantly better specificity, which is further enhanced by the use of ECG gating.
BACKGROUND: Data on the comparative diagnostic accuracy of Tl-201 and Tc-99m sestamibi perfusion imaging for the detection of CAD, specifically in women, are very limited.
METHODS: Eighty-five patients with suspected CAD, scheduled for coronary angiography, and 30 volunteers with a pretest likelihood of < or = 5% for CAD were evaluated. Within 1 week, each patient underwent Tl-201 and Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT imaging procedures (both perfusion and gated SPECT imaging). Treadmill stress testing was used in 78 patients and dipyridamole in the remaining 37 patients. All images were interpreted by three observers in a blinded manner (consensus reading). Technetium-99m sestamibi SPECT studies were read without and then with ECG gating. Technetium-99m sestamibi gated SPECT studies were used to differentiate scar tissue from soft tissue attenuation artifact.
RESULTS: The overall sensitivities for detecting > or = 50% and > or = 70% stenoses were 75.0% and 84.3%, respectively, for Tl-201, and 71.9% and 80.4%, respectively, for Tc-99m sestamibi perfusion studies (p = 0.48). The specificity for lesions > or = 50% was 61.9% for Tl-201 and 85.7% for Tc-99m sestamibi perfusion (p = 0.07), whereas for lesions > or = 70% it was 58.8% for Tl-201 and 82.4% for Tc-99m sestamibi perfusion (p = 0.01). When the 34 patients with a normal coronary angiogram were added to the group of 30 normal volunteers, the "specificity" for lesions > or = 70% was 67.2% for Tl-201, 84.4% for Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT perfusion (p = 0.02) and 92.2% for Tc-99m sestamibi gated SPECT (p = 0.0004).
CONCLUSIONS: Both Tl-201 SPECT and Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT perfusion studies had a similar sensitivity for the detection of CAD in women. However, Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT perfusion imaging shows a significantly better specificity, which is further enhanced by the use of ECG gating.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app