We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Intraarticular calcaneus fractures: a biomechanical comparison or two fixation methods.
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 1997 January
OBJECTIVE: To compare the strength of fixation obtained using two unicortical 4.0 mm diameter cancellous screws versus two bicortical 3.5 mm diameter cortical screws in the fixation of intra-articular calcaneus fractures.
DESIGN: In eight paired fresh frozen cadaver feet, the subtalar joint complex, consisting of the talus, interosseous ligaments, and calcaneus was removed as a unit. An oblique osteotomy of the calcaneus was then created in the sagittal plane. The two fragments were reduced and stabilized using either two unicortical 4.0 mm diameter cancellous screws or two bicortical 3.5 mm diameter cortical screws. A force was then applied to the medial calcaneal tuberosity until failure occurred. In all specimens testing was discontinued due to ligamentous failure, without causing bony disruption.
RESULTS: In all specimens the forced applied to the calcaneus created a disruption of the interosseous ligaments across the subtalar joint and rotation of the calcaneus on the talus. Thus in each specimen, testing was discontinued due to interosseous ligamentous failure, without causing bony disruption. There was no statistically significant difference in force to failure between the specimens fixed with 3.5 mm diameter cortical screws as compared to those fixed with 4.0 mm diameter cancellous screws.
CONCLUSIONS: The lack of a statistically significant difference in force to failure of the intra-articular calcaneus fractures fixed using 3.5 mm diameter cortical screws as compared to those fixed using 4.0 mm diameter cancellous screws and, the fact that the mode of failure was a disruption of ligaments rather than bony disruption suggest that either method of screw fixation is biomechanically adequate.
DESIGN: In eight paired fresh frozen cadaver feet, the subtalar joint complex, consisting of the talus, interosseous ligaments, and calcaneus was removed as a unit. An oblique osteotomy of the calcaneus was then created in the sagittal plane. The two fragments were reduced and stabilized using either two unicortical 4.0 mm diameter cancellous screws or two bicortical 3.5 mm diameter cortical screws. A force was then applied to the medial calcaneal tuberosity until failure occurred. In all specimens testing was discontinued due to ligamentous failure, without causing bony disruption.
RESULTS: In all specimens the forced applied to the calcaneus created a disruption of the interosseous ligaments across the subtalar joint and rotation of the calcaneus on the talus. Thus in each specimen, testing was discontinued due to interosseous ligamentous failure, without causing bony disruption. There was no statistically significant difference in force to failure between the specimens fixed with 3.5 mm diameter cortical screws as compared to those fixed with 4.0 mm diameter cancellous screws.
CONCLUSIONS: The lack of a statistically significant difference in force to failure of the intra-articular calcaneus fractures fixed using 3.5 mm diameter cortical screws as compared to those fixed using 4.0 mm diameter cancellous screws and, the fact that the mode of failure was a disruption of ligaments rather than bony disruption suggest that either method of screw fixation is biomechanically adequate.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app