We have located links that may give you full text access.
Pulmonary function in obese subjects with a normal FEV1/FVC ratio.
Chest 1996 December
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine pulmonary function test (PFT) profile and respiratory muscle strength (RMS) of a group of obese individuals who did not have evidence of obstructive airway disease or other underlying diseases affecting their respiratory system.
DESIGN: Prospective, open.
SETTING: PFT laboratory, VA Medical Center.
PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-three consecutive obese (body mass index greater than 27.8 kg/m2) male subjects without overt obstructive airway disease (FEV1/FVC ratio greater than 80%).
MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Standard PFTs and maximum static inspiratory (PImax) and expiratory (PEmax) mouth pressures were determined. RMS was calculated from the following formula: (PImax+PEmax):2. Two distinct groups were identified, those with normal maximum voluntary ventilation (MVV) (> 80% predicted) and those with low MVV. Both inspiratory and expiratory flow rates (FVC, FEV1, forced expiratory flow at 50% vital capacity [V50], maximum inspiratory flow rate [MIFR]), lung volumes (vital capacity [VC], inspiratory capacity [IC], expiratory reserve volume), PImax, and RMS were significantly lower, and residual volume/total lung capacity (RV/TLC) ratio was significantly higher in obese subjects with low MVV compared with those in whom MVV was normal. MVV correlated significantly with FVC, FEV1, V50, MIFR, TLC, VC, IC, RV/TLC, and RMS; the strongest correlation was with MIFR (r = 0.76, p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Standard PFTs allow recognition of a subgroup of obese subjects without overt obstructive airway disease who have more severe lung dysfunction, the marker of which is a low MVV. Peripheral airway abnormalities may be responsible for these observations.
DESIGN: Prospective, open.
SETTING: PFT laboratory, VA Medical Center.
PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-three consecutive obese (body mass index greater than 27.8 kg/m2) male subjects without overt obstructive airway disease (FEV1/FVC ratio greater than 80%).
MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Standard PFTs and maximum static inspiratory (PImax) and expiratory (PEmax) mouth pressures were determined. RMS was calculated from the following formula: (PImax+PEmax):2. Two distinct groups were identified, those with normal maximum voluntary ventilation (MVV) (> 80% predicted) and those with low MVV. Both inspiratory and expiratory flow rates (FVC, FEV1, forced expiratory flow at 50% vital capacity [V50], maximum inspiratory flow rate [MIFR]), lung volumes (vital capacity [VC], inspiratory capacity [IC], expiratory reserve volume), PImax, and RMS were significantly lower, and residual volume/total lung capacity (RV/TLC) ratio was significantly higher in obese subjects with low MVV compared with those in whom MVV was normal. MVV correlated significantly with FVC, FEV1, V50, MIFR, TLC, VC, IC, RV/TLC, and RMS; the strongest correlation was with MIFR (r = 0.76, p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Standard PFTs allow recognition of a subgroup of obese subjects without overt obstructive airway disease who have more severe lung dysfunction, the marker of which is a low MVV. Peripheral airway abnormalities may be responsible for these observations.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app