We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Impact of the introduction of new medical methods on therapeutic abortions at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh.
British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1996 December
OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of the introduction of new medical methods on the provision of therapeutic abortions at the Royal Infirmary Edinburgh.
DESIGN: A review of the total number of abortions performed by medical and surgical means between 1989 and 1995 (inclusive); a prospective survey of the terminations of pregnancy (< or = 9 weeks of gestation) performed over the six-month period of January to June 1994; and a questionnaire of the reasons why women chosen a particular method.
SETTING: Large teaching hospital in Scotland.
SUBJECTS: One thousand and seven women seeking early pregnancy termination between January and June 1994.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of pregnancies terminated by medical means; comparison of complete abortion rate, incidence of complications and morbidity following both medical and surgical methods (< or = 9 weeks of gestation); reasons for preference of the method of abortion.
RESULTS: Since 1991 there has been a progressive increase in the number of medical abortions performed at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, and by 1994 the majority of women (57%) seeking abortion at < or = 9 weeks chose a medical method. Women who chose medical abortion had more years at full-time education and were less likely to smoke (P < 0.04). Both medical and surgical methods were highly effective (> 96% complete abortion) with a low incidence of complications and morbidity. However, women who had chosen the medical method were less likely to receive antibiotics for suspected endometritis than their surgical counterparts (chi 2, P = 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: If this trend towards medical methods in Edinburgh is repeated elsewhere, it will inevitably have an impact on gynaecological services by releasing staff and operating time for other purposes.
DESIGN: A review of the total number of abortions performed by medical and surgical means between 1989 and 1995 (inclusive); a prospective survey of the terminations of pregnancy (< or = 9 weeks of gestation) performed over the six-month period of January to June 1994; and a questionnaire of the reasons why women chosen a particular method.
SETTING: Large teaching hospital in Scotland.
SUBJECTS: One thousand and seven women seeking early pregnancy termination between January and June 1994.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of pregnancies terminated by medical means; comparison of complete abortion rate, incidence of complications and morbidity following both medical and surgical methods (< or = 9 weeks of gestation); reasons for preference of the method of abortion.
RESULTS: Since 1991 there has been a progressive increase in the number of medical abortions performed at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, and by 1994 the majority of women (57%) seeking abortion at < or = 9 weeks chose a medical method. Women who chose medical abortion had more years at full-time education and were less likely to smoke (P < 0.04). Both medical and surgical methods were highly effective (> 96% complete abortion) with a low incidence of complications and morbidity. However, women who had chosen the medical method were less likely to receive antibiotics for suspected endometritis than their surgical counterparts (chi 2, P = 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: If this trend towards medical methods in Edinburgh is repeated elsewhere, it will inevitably have an impact on gynaecological services by releasing staff and operating time for other purposes.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app