We have located links that may give you full text access.
Value of the peak expiratory flow in bronchodynamic tests.
Allergologia et Immunopathologia 1996 March
OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of the peak expiratory flow (PEF) as an alternative parameter to the forced expiratory volume at first second (FEV1) in the bronchodynamic tests.
METHODOLOGY: We studied 84 patients, 53 males and 31 females, with average age 46 +/- 13 years, as clinic suspects of bronchial asthma. PEF was determined with a "mini-Wright peak flow meter" and a spirometry was obtained. Based on the results, 44 subjects were classified under group 1 (FEV1/FVC < 70% and FEV1 < 80% of theoretic value) and subjected to a bronchodilator test. While in group 2 subjects (normal spirometry), a methacholine challenge was performed. During each procedure, PEF readings were obtained before FEV1 determination. The usefulness of the PEF for the diagnosis of reversibility or bronchial obstruction with respect to the FEV1 was assessed in both groups.
RESULTS: In the bronchodilator tests, a cut-off point was found for the increase in the PEF > 18%, which showed a sensitivity of 85%, specificity of 79%, positive predictive value of 77% and negative predictive value of 86%, with respect to an increase in the FEV1 > 15%. In the methacholine challenge, a decrease in the PEF > 12% only achieved a sensitivity of 74% and specificity of 71%.
CONCLUSION: Peak expiratory flow may be an useful parameter in bronchodilator tests. However, it should not be used in methacholine challenge.
METHODOLOGY: We studied 84 patients, 53 males and 31 females, with average age 46 +/- 13 years, as clinic suspects of bronchial asthma. PEF was determined with a "mini-Wright peak flow meter" and a spirometry was obtained. Based on the results, 44 subjects were classified under group 1 (FEV1/FVC < 70% and FEV1 < 80% of theoretic value) and subjected to a bronchodilator test. While in group 2 subjects (normal spirometry), a methacholine challenge was performed. During each procedure, PEF readings were obtained before FEV1 determination. The usefulness of the PEF for the diagnosis of reversibility or bronchial obstruction with respect to the FEV1 was assessed in both groups.
RESULTS: In the bronchodilator tests, a cut-off point was found for the increase in the PEF > 18%, which showed a sensitivity of 85%, specificity of 79%, positive predictive value of 77% and negative predictive value of 86%, with respect to an increase in the FEV1 > 15%. In the methacholine challenge, a decrease in the PEF > 12% only achieved a sensitivity of 74% and specificity of 71%.
CONCLUSION: Peak expiratory flow may be an useful parameter in bronchodilator tests. However, it should not be used in methacholine challenge.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app