Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Comparison of technetium-99m-HMPAO and technetium-99m-ECD cerebral SPECT images in Alzheimer's disease.

UNLABELLED: SPECT has shown increasing promise as a diagnostic tool in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Recently, a new SPECT brain perfusion agent, 99mTc-ethyl cysteinate dimer (99mTc-ECD) has emerged with purported advantages in image quality over the established tracer, 99mTc-hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime (99mTc-HMPAO). This research aimed to compare cerebral images for 99mTc-HMPAO and 99mTc-ECD in discriminating patients with AD from control subjects.

METHODS: Twenty-four AD patients (mean age +/- s.d. = 68.9 +/- 8.2 yr) and 13 healthy subjects (68.4 +/- 8.0 yr) were scanned sequentially with 20 mCi of each tracer using the CERASPECT system within 1 mo. Scanning began on average 11.5 +/- 2.8 min after 99mTc-HMPAO injection and 41.8 +/- 10.1 min after 99mTc-ECD. A ratio, R, was derived of count densities in "typically affected" brain structures (parietal and temporal association cortices) to "unaffected" structures (cerebellum, basal ganglia, thalamus, occipital cortex, and sensorimotor cortex).

RESULTS: Analysis of variance revealed significant interaction between diagnostic group and radiopharmaceutical (F = 4.71; df = 1.35; p = 0.04), with 99mTc-ECD demonstrating better separation of R values between AD patients and control subjects than 99mTc-HMPAO. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, revealed no significant difference in the ability of the two tracers to correctly classify AD patients and control subjects. Both tracers showed high diagnostic accuracy (99mTc-ECD: sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 92%; 99mTc-HMPAO: sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 85%).

CONCLUSION: Technetium-99m-ECD shows greater contrast than 99mTc-HMPAO between affected and unaffected brain structures in AD when patients are compared to age-matched control subjects. Both tracers perform equally well in correctly classifying patients and control subjects.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app