We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Comparison of technetium-99m-HMPAO and technetium-99m-ECD cerebral SPECT images in Alzheimer's disease.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine 1996 November
UNLABELLED: SPECT has shown increasing promise as a diagnostic tool in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Recently, a new SPECT brain perfusion agent, 99mTc-ethyl cysteinate dimer (99mTc-ECD) has emerged with purported advantages in image quality over the established tracer, 99mTc-hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime (99mTc-HMPAO). This research aimed to compare cerebral images for 99mTc-HMPAO and 99mTc-ECD in discriminating patients with AD from control subjects.
METHODS: Twenty-four AD patients (mean age +/- s.d. = 68.9 +/- 8.2 yr) and 13 healthy subjects (68.4 +/- 8.0 yr) were scanned sequentially with 20 mCi of each tracer using the CERASPECT system within 1 mo. Scanning began on average 11.5 +/- 2.8 min after 99mTc-HMPAO injection and 41.8 +/- 10.1 min after 99mTc-ECD. A ratio, R, was derived of count densities in "typically affected" brain structures (parietal and temporal association cortices) to "unaffected" structures (cerebellum, basal ganglia, thalamus, occipital cortex, and sensorimotor cortex).
RESULTS: Analysis of variance revealed significant interaction between diagnostic group and radiopharmaceutical (F = 4.71; df = 1.35; p = 0.04), with 99mTc-ECD demonstrating better separation of R values between AD patients and control subjects than 99mTc-HMPAO. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, revealed no significant difference in the ability of the two tracers to correctly classify AD patients and control subjects. Both tracers showed high diagnostic accuracy (99mTc-ECD: sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 92%; 99mTc-HMPAO: sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 85%).
CONCLUSION: Technetium-99m-ECD shows greater contrast than 99mTc-HMPAO between affected and unaffected brain structures in AD when patients are compared to age-matched control subjects. Both tracers perform equally well in correctly classifying patients and control subjects.
METHODS: Twenty-four AD patients (mean age +/- s.d. = 68.9 +/- 8.2 yr) and 13 healthy subjects (68.4 +/- 8.0 yr) were scanned sequentially with 20 mCi of each tracer using the CERASPECT system within 1 mo. Scanning began on average 11.5 +/- 2.8 min after 99mTc-HMPAO injection and 41.8 +/- 10.1 min after 99mTc-ECD. A ratio, R, was derived of count densities in "typically affected" brain structures (parietal and temporal association cortices) to "unaffected" structures (cerebellum, basal ganglia, thalamus, occipital cortex, and sensorimotor cortex).
RESULTS: Analysis of variance revealed significant interaction between diagnostic group and radiopharmaceutical (F = 4.71; df = 1.35; p = 0.04), with 99mTc-ECD demonstrating better separation of R values between AD patients and control subjects than 99mTc-HMPAO. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, revealed no significant difference in the ability of the two tracers to correctly classify AD patients and control subjects. Both tracers showed high diagnostic accuracy (99mTc-ECD: sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 92%; 99mTc-HMPAO: sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 85%).
CONCLUSION: Technetium-99m-ECD shows greater contrast than 99mTc-HMPAO between affected and unaffected brain structures in AD when patients are compared to age-matched control subjects. Both tracers perform equally well in correctly classifying patients and control subjects.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app