We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
A comparison between the acute effects of nitric oxide synthase inhibition and fluid resuscitation on myocardial function and metabolism in entotoxemic dogs.
Journal of Critical Care 1996 March
PURPOSE: Nitric oxide (NO) synthase inhibitors increase mean arterial pressure (MAP) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) in animal models of sepsis and in humans with septic shock. However, NO synthase inhibitors may cause coronary vessel constriction leading to myocardial ischemia and increased mortality in endotoxemic animals. This study was designed to test the acute effect of NG-nitro-L-arginine (L-NAME) on left ventricular (LV) function and coronary blood flow in a dog model of endotoxemia.
METHODS: In open chest, anesthetized dogs endotoxemia was induced intravenously (IV) by Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide at 2 mg/kg for 60 minutes. This resulted in hypotension, acidosis, and decreased SVR while cardiac index (CI) was maintained. When MAP was < or = 60 mm Hg, animals were resuscitated with either dextran (group I), or L-NAME 30 mg/kg IV bolus (group II). Group III received L-NAME only. A fourth group of dogs was given endotoxin and not resuscitated. Animals were followed up for 30 minutes after intervention. Animals in the fourth group were followed up until the MAP was approximately 30 mm Hg. Heart rate, CI, MAP, LV end systolic and diastolic pressures, dP/dt at a pressure of 40 mm Hg, left anterior descending artery coronary blood flow, regional LV contraction (sonomicrometer crystals), coronary pressures, gas tension, and lactates were continuously recorded. A catheter placed in the coronary sinus allowed measurement of coronary sinus pressure, as well as coronary sinus lactate and gas tensions. Stroke volume index, stroke work index, systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI), coronary vascular resistance, percent myocardial shortening, myocardial oxygen consumption (Mvo2) and net myocardial lactate production were calculated.
RESULTS: In Group I, fluid administration increased MAP, stroke work index, coronary blood flow, percent myocardial shortening, and Mvo2. In Group II, L-NAME increased MAP to the same extent as fluid administration without evidence of coronary ischemia or myocardial dysfunction. L-NAME did not alter Mvo2 in either endotoxemic or nonendotoxemic animals. In group III, L-NAME alone resulted in a significant increase in MAP and SVRI, but its effects on coronary blood flow and LV function were not significant. We did not observe net lactate production in any of the groups. Coronary blood flow increased out of proportion to Mvo2 in group I animals.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that although L-NAME at 30 mg/kg causes vasoconstriction, its effects on coronary blood flow and LV function were not significant.
METHODS: In open chest, anesthetized dogs endotoxemia was induced intravenously (IV) by Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide at 2 mg/kg for 60 minutes. This resulted in hypotension, acidosis, and decreased SVR while cardiac index (CI) was maintained. When MAP was < or = 60 mm Hg, animals were resuscitated with either dextran (group I), or L-NAME 30 mg/kg IV bolus (group II). Group III received L-NAME only. A fourth group of dogs was given endotoxin and not resuscitated. Animals were followed up for 30 minutes after intervention. Animals in the fourth group were followed up until the MAP was approximately 30 mm Hg. Heart rate, CI, MAP, LV end systolic and diastolic pressures, dP/dt at a pressure of 40 mm Hg, left anterior descending artery coronary blood flow, regional LV contraction (sonomicrometer crystals), coronary pressures, gas tension, and lactates were continuously recorded. A catheter placed in the coronary sinus allowed measurement of coronary sinus pressure, as well as coronary sinus lactate and gas tensions. Stroke volume index, stroke work index, systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI), coronary vascular resistance, percent myocardial shortening, myocardial oxygen consumption (Mvo2) and net myocardial lactate production were calculated.
RESULTS: In Group I, fluid administration increased MAP, stroke work index, coronary blood flow, percent myocardial shortening, and Mvo2. In Group II, L-NAME increased MAP to the same extent as fluid administration without evidence of coronary ischemia or myocardial dysfunction. L-NAME did not alter Mvo2 in either endotoxemic or nonendotoxemic animals. In group III, L-NAME alone resulted in a significant increase in MAP and SVRI, but its effects on coronary blood flow and LV function were not significant. We did not observe net lactate production in any of the groups. Coronary blood flow increased out of proportion to Mvo2 in group I animals.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that although L-NAME at 30 mg/kg causes vasoconstriction, its effects on coronary blood flow and LV function were not significant.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app