We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Comparison of synovial tissue and synovial fluid as the source of nucleic acids for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by polymerase chain reaction.
Arthritis and Rheumatism 1996 October
OBJECTIVE: Difficulties in detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in human joints by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) may be related to whether synovial tissue or synovial fluid (SF) is used as the source of DNA in PCR amplification. In this study, a new PCR assay was developed and used to compare chlamydial DNA in paired samples of SF and synovial tissue from patients with arthritis.
METHODS: The PCR assay targeted the ribosomal RNA operons, which are present in 2 copies on the C trachomatis chromosome. DNA from several relevant bacteria and chlamydial serovars was used for testing this screening system. The detection of chlamydial DNA in nucleic acid preparations from matched samples of SF and synovial tissue was compared by PCR assay. Samples were obtained from 55 patients, including patients with reactive arthritis, Reiter's syndrome, and other arthropathies.
RESULTS: Testing of the PCR screening system confirmed it to be highly specific and sensitive. Use of this assay to screen DNA from SF and synovial tissue samples showed that 29 (53%) of 55 synovial tissue preparations were positive for chlamydial DNA, but only 16 (29%) of the matched SF samples from these 29 patients were similarly positive. Five (9%) of 55 SF samples, but not their tissue counterparts, were positive for chlamydial DNA by PCR.
CONCLUSION: Detection of chlamydial DNA in the joints of patients by PCR gives positive results more often when synovial tissue rather than SF is the source of target nucleic acids. Although synovial tissue is the source of choice for the most reliable determination of chlamydia in the joint, both synovial tissue and SF should be assayed if possible.
METHODS: The PCR assay targeted the ribosomal RNA operons, which are present in 2 copies on the C trachomatis chromosome. DNA from several relevant bacteria and chlamydial serovars was used for testing this screening system. The detection of chlamydial DNA in nucleic acid preparations from matched samples of SF and synovial tissue was compared by PCR assay. Samples were obtained from 55 patients, including patients with reactive arthritis, Reiter's syndrome, and other arthropathies.
RESULTS: Testing of the PCR screening system confirmed it to be highly specific and sensitive. Use of this assay to screen DNA from SF and synovial tissue samples showed that 29 (53%) of 55 synovial tissue preparations were positive for chlamydial DNA, but only 16 (29%) of the matched SF samples from these 29 patients were similarly positive. Five (9%) of 55 SF samples, but not their tissue counterparts, were positive for chlamydial DNA by PCR.
CONCLUSION: Detection of chlamydial DNA in the joints of patients by PCR gives positive results more often when synovial tissue rather than SF is the source of target nucleic acids. Although synovial tissue is the source of choice for the most reliable determination of chlamydia in the joint, both synovial tissue and SF should be assayed if possible.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app