We have located links that may give you full text access.
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology : Official Journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology 1996 January
OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) as an adjunct in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).
METHODS: Four hundred and sixty consecutive patients with cholelithiasis were evaluated for LC over a four-year period (January 1991 to January 1995). Forty four (9.6%) patients underwent pre-operative ERC on a suspicion of harboring common bile duct (CBD) stones. Ten other patients who presented with acute gallstone pancreatitis also had pre-operative ERC as soon as the acute attack had settled. Endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) and stone extraction were done if indicated. After LC, four patients underwent ERC for cystic or CBD related complications.
RESULTS: Cannulation was possible in all patients undergoing ERC. Of 44 patients with suspected CBD stones, 33 (75%) actually had stones. In 30 patients the stones could be extracted. Three patients had large stones which could not be extracted. Of 10 patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis, CBD stones were found in only one. In the 4 patients who developed ductal complications, ERC was used to place stents in three and to extract a missed CBD stone in one. Three patients developed fever after ERC and three others had transient hyperamylasemia. There were no other ERC related problems.
CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing LC, ERC is a useful adjunct both pre- and post-operatively.
METHODS: Four hundred and sixty consecutive patients with cholelithiasis were evaluated for LC over a four-year period (January 1991 to January 1995). Forty four (9.6%) patients underwent pre-operative ERC on a suspicion of harboring common bile duct (CBD) stones. Ten other patients who presented with acute gallstone pancreatitis also had pre-operative ERC as soon as the acute attack had settled. Endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) and stone extraction were done if indicated. After LC, four patients underwent ERC for cystic or CBD related complications.
RESULTS: Cannulation was possible in all patients undergoing ERC. Of 44 patients with suspected CBD stones, 33 (75%) actually had stones. In 30 patients the stones could be extracted. Three patients had large stones which could not be extracted. Of 10 patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis, CBD stones were found in only one. In the 4 patients who developed ductal complications, ERC was used to place stents in three and to extract a missed CBD stone in one. Three patients developed fever after ERC and three others had transient hyperamylasemia. There were no other ERC related problems.
CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing LC, ERC is a useful adjunct both pre- and post-operatively.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app