We have located links that may give you full text access.
CLINICAL TRIAL
JOURNAL ARTICLE
MULTICENTER STUDY
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Relationship between pharmacodynamic activity and cognitive effects of eptastigmine in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Eptastigmine Study Group.
Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 1996 August
OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary efficacy of eptastigmine, a new long-acting cholinesterase inhibitor, in patients with probable Alzheimer's disease.
METHODS: This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, unbalanced parallel-group study. One-hundred and three patients (83 in the eptastigmine group and 20 in the placebo group) were recruited by 10 centers. Patients received 20 mg eptastigmine or placebo for 4 weeks with twice-a-day or three-times-a-day regimens, depending on body weight (< or = 65 kg or > 65 kg, respectively). Patient performance on the Logical Memory Test, Semantic Word Fluency Test, Trail Making Test, Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scales (IADL), and the Physician and Caregiver Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) was assessed at baseline and at the end of treatment.
RESULTS: Nine patients, all from the eptastigmine group, did not complete treatment because of uncooperativeness (n = 3), adverse events (n = 3), protocol violations (n = 2), and clinical decline (n = 1). Twenty-five patients receiving eptastigmine (34%) reported adverse events mainly of the cholinergic type. Cholinergic side effects were generally associated with peak red blood cell cholinesterase inhibition exceeding 50% after the first dose, or 70% at steady state. At steady state, average daily acetylcholinesterase inhibition ranged from 13% to 54%. Overall, 34% of patients receiving eptastigmine versus 0% receiving placebo (p = 0.006) improved on the Physician CGIC. This percentage increased to 46% in the subgroup of patients with average daily acetylcholinesterase inhibition ranging from 30% to 35%. Patient performance on the IADL also improved significantly compared with the placebo group (p = 0.019). In the eptastigmine group, performances on all tests and scales improved with an inverted U-shaped relation to average daily acetylcholinesterase inhibition.
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that doses of 40 to 60 mg per day of eptastigmine are relatively safe and well tolerated and that moderate acetylcholinesterase inhibition is associated with maximal cognitive efficacy.
METHODS: This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, unbalanced parallel-group study. One-hundred and three patients (83 in the eptastigmine group and 20 in the placebo group) were recruited by 10 centers. Patients received 20 mg eptastigmine or placebo for 4 weeks with twice-a-day or three-times-a-day regimens, depending on body weight (< or = 65 kg or > 65 kg, respectively). Patient performance on the Logical Memory Test, Semantic Word Fluency Test, Trail Making Test, Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scales (IADL), and the Physician and Caregiver Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) was assessed at baseline and at the end of treatment.
RESULTS: Nine patients, all from the eptastigmine group, did not complete treatment because of uncooperativeness (n = 3), adverse events (n = 3), protocol violations (n = 2), and clinical decline (n = 1). Twenty-five patients receiving eptastigmine (34%) reported adverse events mainly of the cholinergic type. Cholinergic side effects were generally associated with peak red blood cell cholinesterase inhibition exceeding 50% after the first dose, or 70% at steady state. At steady state, average daily acetylcholinesterase inhibition ranged from 13% to 54%. Overall, 34% of patients receiving eptastigmine versus 0% receiving placebo (p = 0.006) improved on the Physician CGIC. This percentage increased to 46% in the subgroup of patients with average daily acetylcholinesterase inhibition ranging from 30% to 35%. Patient performance on the IADL also improved significantly compared with the placebo group (p = 0.019). In the eptastigmine group, performances on all tests and scales improved with an inverted U-shaped relation to average daily acetylcholinesterase inhibition.
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that doses of 40 to 60 mg per day of eptastigmine are relatively safe and well tolerated and that moderate acetylcholinesterase inhibition is associated with maximal cognitive efficacy.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Anti-Arrhythmic Effects of Heart Failure Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy and Their Role in the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death: From Beta-Blockers to Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors and Beyond.Journal of Clinical Medicine 2024 Februrary 27
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app