We have located links that may give you full text access.
Single serum progesterone as a screen for ectopic pregnancy: exchanging specificity and sensitivity to obtain optimal test performance.
Fertility and Sterility 1996 October
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of screening serum P in diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy (EP) and to identify a cutoff value that provides the best compromise between test sensitivity and specificity.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis.
SETTING: University hospital.
INTERVENTIONS: Observation only.
PATIENTS: First trimester pregnant women at risk for EP.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Single P measurements were obtained from 3,674 pregnancies with outcomes defined as EP, viable intrauterine pregnancy (IUP), and spontaneous abortion (SAB). Diagnostic accuracy of the test was analyzed by generating receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, which quantify the ability of the test to distinguish EP and SAB from IUP.
RESULTS: Diagnostic accuracy for EP versus IUP was 88.7% +/- 0.1% (mean +/- SEM); for SAB versus IUP, 93.8% +/- 0.4%; and for SAB + EP versus IUP, 92.8% +/- 0.4%. Diagnostic accuracy for SAB versus EP was only 39.4% +/- 0.2%. In the interval of 15.0 to 19.9 ng/mL (47.7 to 63.3 nmol/L), P missed 5.3% of the EPs and incorrectly included 84.3% of the viable IUPs; in the interval of 20.0 to 24.9 ng/mL (63.6 to 79.2 nmol/L), sensitivity improved in that only 3.5% of the EPs were missed but 88.8% of viable IUPs were included incorrectly. A cutoff value of > or = 17.5 ng/mL (55.7 nmol/L), the median point of the 15.0 to 19.9 ng/mL (47.7 to 63.3 nmol/L) interval, missed only 35 of 423 (8.3%) total EPs in the study.
CONCLUSION: Analysis of ROC curves demonstrates that single serum P has high diagnostic accuracy for differentiating accidents of pregnancy (SAB and EP) from viable IUP, both individually (SAB versus IUP and EP versus IUP) and collectively (SAB + EP versus IUP); it cannot efficiently discriminate SAB versus EP. We conclude that for P > or = 17.5 ng/mL (55.7 nmol/L), patients thought to be at risk for EP may be followed reasonably without ultrasound or further invasive diagnostic studies.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis.
SETTING: University hospital.
INTERVENTIONS: Observation only.
PATIENTS: First trimester pregnant women at risk for EP.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Single P measurements were obtained from 3,674 pregnancies with outcomes defined as EP, viable intrauterine pregnancy (IUP), and spontaneous abortion (SAB). Diagnostic accuracy of the test was analyzed by generating receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, which quantify the ability of the test to distinguish EP and SAB from IUP.
RESULTS: Diagnostic accuracy for EP versus IUP was 88.7% +/- 0.1% (mean +/- SEM); for SAB versus IUP, 93.8% +/- 0.4%; and for SAB + EP versus IUP, 92.8% +/- 0.4%. Diagnostic accuracy for SAB versus EP was only 39.4% +/- 0.2%. In the interval of 15.0 to 19.9 ng/mL (47.7 to 63.3 nmol/L), P missed 5.3% of the EPs and incorrectly included 84.3% of the viable IUPs; in the interval of 20.0 to 24.9 ng/mL (63.6 to 79.2 nmol/L), sensitivity improved in that only 3.5% of the EPs were missed but 88.8% of viable IUPs were included incorrectly. A cutoff value of > or = 17.5 ng/mL (55.7 nmol/L), the median point of the 15.0 to 19.9 ng/mL (47.7 to 63.3 nmol/L) interval, missed only 35 of 423 (8.3%) total EPs in the study.
CONCLUSION: Analysis of ROC curves demonstrates that single serum P has high diagnostic accuracy for differentiating accidents of pregnancy (SAB and EP) from viable IUP, both individually (SAB versus IUP and EP versus IUP) and collectively (SAB + EP versus IUP); it cannot efficiently discriminate SAB versus EP. We conclude that for P > or = 17.5 ng/mL (55.7 nmol/L), patients thought to be at risk for EP may be followed reasonably without ultrasound or further invasive diagnostic studies.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app