We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
RESEARCH SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, P.H.S.
REVIEW
Mandibular form and function in North American and European Adapidae and Omomyidae.
Journal of Morphology 1996 August
Previous experimental and comparative studies among a wide variety of primate and nonprimate mammals provide a unique source of information for investigating the functional and phylogenetic significance of variation in the masticatory apparatus of Eocene primates. To provide a quantitative study of mandibular form and function in Eocene primates, the scaling of jaw dimensions and the development of symphyseal fusion was considered in a broad sample of North American and European Adapidae and Omomyidae. Statistical analyses indicate a significant size-related pattern of symphyseal fusion across Eocene primates, with larger taxa often having a greater degree of fusion than smaller species; this trend is also evident at the family level. As adapids are mostly larger than omomyids and these taxa show allometry of symphyseal fusion, this may explain why no omomyids evince complete fusion. Controlling for jaw size, species with greater symphyseal fusion tend to have more robust jaws than those with a lesser amount of fusion. Upon further examination, a primary reason why adapids have more robust mandibles than omomyids is associated with the presence of taxa with fused symphyses, and thus more robust jaws, in the adapid sample, whereas no omomyids have fused symphyses. In addition, there is little indication of a dietary effect, as measured by molar shear-crest development, on symphyseal fusion. Moreover, as there is no correlation between molar shear-crest development and skull size, this also points to the absence of a size-related pattern of dietary preference underlying the allometry of symphyseal fusion. Based on the interspecific and ontogenetic allometry of symphyseal ossification in Eocene primates, jaw-scaling patterns are used to further examine the functional determinants of fusion in this group. This study indicates that greater dorsoventral shear during mastication is a more likely factor than lateral transverse bending ("wishboning") in the evolution of symphyseal fusion among "late-fusing" mammals like adapids and omomyids. Given that wishboning is an important functional determinant of symphyseal form in recent anthropoids, apparently the evolutionary development of marked wishboning occurs only in taxa that shift the timing of fusion to a growth stage preceding the onset of weaning (before adult masticatory patterns are fully developed) and perhaps first ossified the symphysis to counter elevated dorsoventral shear stress. As early anthropoids probably consisted of members varying interspecifically and ontogenetically in the degree of ossification, it is especially informative to analyze the adaptive setting in which anthropoid symphyseal fusion evolved from a similar primitive "prosimian" perspective. Finally, since taxa with fused symphyses are widely distributed across mammals, a similar analytical framework could be directed profitably at unraveling the functional and evolutionary significance of symphyseal fusion in other mammalian clades.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app