We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Physiologic definitions of obliterative bronchiolitis in heart-lung and double lung transplantation: a comparison of the forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of the forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in one second.
Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation 1996 Februrary
BACKGROUND AND METHODS: A comparison of the forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of the forced vital capacity (FEF25-75) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was conducted for the detection of obstructive airway disease as an early manifestation of obliterative bronchiolitis. Pulmonary function tests performed on heart-lung and double lung transplant recipients between March 1981 and March 1983 were reviewed. Thirty patients were identified who showed progressive deterioration in pulmonary function after transplantation. Ratios determining proportionate decreases were calculated from measurements of absolute values for the FEF25-75 and FEV1 at the point when the FEF25-75 reached < 70% and < or = 30% of predicted, divided by baseline values obtained before the decline in function. Similar ratios were obtained for FEV1 and FEF25-75 at the point the FEV1 declined > or = 20% from its baseline value.
RESULTS: Comparison of the ratios for the FEF25-75 and FEV1 at FEF25-75 values < 70% and < or = 30% of predicted and a similar comparison when the FEV1 declined > or = 20% from baseline showed a greater proportional decrease in FEF25-75 than FEV1 (p < 0.01). With the use of the FEF25-75, declines in airway function were detected earlier. After transplantation a decline in FEF25-75 to < 70% of predicted occurred approximately 112 days before a 20% decline a FEV1.
CONCLUSION: The FEF25-75 is more sensitive than the FEV1 for the early detection of obliterative bronchiolitis. A presumptive diagnosis of obliterative bronchiolitis can be made with physiologic criteria, providing infection or acute rejection has been ruled out. When conducting epidemiologic studies or for vital statistics we propose that a decline in FEF25-75 to < 70% be used to define the onset of obliterative bronchiolitis.
RESULTS: Comparison of the ratios for the FEF25-75 and FEV1 at FEF25-75 values < 70% and < or = 30% of predicted and a similar comparison when the FEV1 declined > or = 20% from baseline showed a greater proportional decrease in FEF25-75 than FEV1 (p < 0.01). With the use of the FEF25-75, declines in airway function were detected earlier. After transplantation a decline in FEF25-75 to < 70% of predicted occurred approximately 112 days before a 20% decline a FEV1.
CONCLUSION: The FEF25-75 is more sensitive than the FEV1 for the early detection of obliterative bronchiolitis. A presumptive diagnosis of obliterative bronchiolitis can be made with physiologic criteria, providing infection or acute rejection has been ruled out. When conducting epidemiologic studies or for vital statistics we propose that a decline in FEF25-75 to < 70% be used to define the onset of obliterative bronchiolitis.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
The Effect of Albumin Administration in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis.Critical Care Medicine 2024 Februrary 8
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app