We have located links that may give you full text access.
Renal artery stenosis: endovascular flow wire study for validation of Doppler US.
Radiology 1996 July
PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of proximal and peripheral Doppler parameters for detection of renal artery stenosis (RAS).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors obtained absolute velocities and peripheral Doppler waveforms in 16 stenotic and 14 normal renal arteries by using a 0.45-mm endovascular flow wire. Hemodynamically significant stenosis was established by measuring transstenotic invasive pressure gradients, with a 10 mm Hg or greater pressure drop indicating RAS. Accuracy of the Doppler parameters and of digital subtraction angiographic (DSA) results were compared by using receiver operating characteristic analysis.
RESULTS: Measurements of absolute velocities at the site of the stenosis (maximal peak systolic velocity [PSVmax], PSV ratio, renal artery-to-aortic PVS ratio) showed high accuracy for diagnosis of RAS similar to that of DSA (areas under the ROC curve were 0.96, 0.97, 0.93, respectively). The distal intrarenal Doppler indexes (notably loss of early systolic peak, acceleration, acceleration time, pulsatility index, and resistive index) did not show statistically significant correlation with RAS.
CONCLUSION: Doppler measurements in the main renal artery correlate well with RAS. The intrarenal Doppler spectrum, however, has no diagnostic value. The authors conclude that duplex Doppler US is not a suitable screening test for RAS.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors obtained absolute velocities and peripheral Doppler waveforms in 16 stenotic and 14 normal renal arteries by using a 0.45-mm endovascular flow wire. Hemodynamically significant stenosis was established by measuring transstenotic invasive pressure gradients, with a 10 mm Hg or greater pressure drop indicating RAS. Accuracy of the Doppler parameters and of digital subtraction angiographic (DSA) results were compared by using receiver operating characteristic analysis.
RESULTS: Measurements of absolute velocities at the site of the stenosis (maximal peak systolic velocity [PSVmax], PSV ratio, renal artery-to-aortic PVS ratio) showed high accuracy for diagnosis of RAS similar to that of DSA (areas under the ROC curve were 0.96, 0.97, 0.93, respectively). The distal intrarenal Doppler indexes (notably loss of early systolic peak, acceleration, acceleration time, pulsatility index, and resistive index) did not show statistically significant correlation with RAS.
CONCLUSION: Doppler measurements in the main renal artery correlate well with RAS. The intrarenal Doppler spectrum, however, has no diagnostic value. The authors conclude that duplex Doppler US is not a suitable screening test for RAS.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app