We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Sacral plexus: optimal imaging planes for MR assessment.
Radiology 1996 June
PURPOSE: To identify the optimal imaging planes for magnetic resonance (MR) evaluation of the sacral plexus (SP) and proximal sciatic nerve (SN).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The SPs of 10 health adult volunteers were prospectively studied with T1-weighted MR imaging with custom-built pelvic phased-array coils. The conspicuity of 12 anatomic characteristics (comprising the SP and their relationship to normal pelvic anatomy) on a series of coronal, axial, and oblique images was graded. Results were evaluated with the Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon signed rank tests.
RESULTS: At least two planes were necessary to assess the anatomy of the SP and SN. Analysis of average conspicuity scores showed that the direct coronal and direct axial planes were the best overall and were superior to other imaging planes in the demonstration of the L-4 and L-5 ventral rami, the lumbosacral trunk, the S-1 contribution to the SN, and the SN in the greater sciatic foramen. The sacral coronal plane was best for the visualization of the bony sacrum, sacral foramina, and proximal S-1 to S-4 nerve roots. The remaining imaging planes had limited utility.
CONCLUSION: MR imaging with a combination of direct coronal and direct axial planes enables thorough evaluation of all components of the SP and proximal SN.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The SPs of 10 health adult volunteers were prospectively studied with T1-weighted MR imaging with custom-built pelvic phased-array coils. The conspicuity of 12 anatomic characteristics (comprising the SP and their relationship to normal pelvic anatomy) on a series of coronal, axial, and oblique images was graded. Results were evaluated with the Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon signed rank tests.
RESULTS: At least two planes were necessary to assess the anatomy of the SP and SN. Analysis of average conspicuity scores showed that the direct coronal and direct axial planes were the best overall and were superior to other imaging planes in the demonstration of the L-4 and L-5 ventral rami, the lumbosacral trunk, the S-1 contribution to the SN, and the SN in the greater sciatic foramen. The sacral coronal plane was best for the visualization of the bony sacrum, sacral foramina, and proximal S-1 to S-4 nerve roots. The remaining imaging planes had limited utility.
CONCLUSION: MR imaging with a combination of direct coronal and direct axial planes enables thorough evaluation of all components of the SP and proximal SN.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app