We have located links that may give you full text access.
Deprivation and cause specific morbidity: evidence from the Somerset and Avon survey of health.
BMJ : British Medical Journal 1996 Februrary 4
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between cause specific morbidity and deprivation in order to inform the debates on inequalities in health and health services resource allocation.
DESIGN: Cross sectional postal questionnaire survey ascertaining self reported health status, with validation of a 20% sample through general practitioner and hospital records.
SETTING: Inner city, urban, and rural areas of Avon and Somerset.
SUBJECTS: Stratified random sample of 28,080 people aged 35 and over from 40 general practices.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Age and sex standardised prevalence of various diseases; Townsend deprivation scores were assigned by linking postcodes to enumeration districts. Relative indices of inequality were calculated to estimate the magnitude of the association between socioeconomic position and morbidity.
RESULTS: The response rate was 85.3%. The prevalence of most of the conditions rose with increasing material deprivation. The relative index of inequalilty, for both sexes combined, was greater than 1 for all conditions except diabetes. The conditions most strongly associated with deprivation were diabetic eye disease (relative index of inequality 3.21; 95% confidence interval 1.84 to 5.59), emphysema (2.72; 1.67 to 4.43) and bronchitis (2.27; 1.92 to 2.68). The relative index of inequality was significantly higher in women for asthma (P < 0.05) and in men for depression (P < 0.01). The mean reporting of prevalent conditions was 1.07 for the most deprived fifth of respondents and 0.77 in the most affluent fifth (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Material deprivation is strongly linked with many common diseases. NHS resource allocation should be modified to reflect such morbidity differentials.
DESIGN: Cross sectional postal questionnaire survey ascertaining self reported health status, with validation of a 20% sample through general practitioner and hospital records.
SETTING: Inner city, urban, and rural areas of Avon and Somerset.
SUBJECTS: Stratified random sample of 28,080 people aged 35 and over from 40 general practices.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Age and sex standardised prevalence of various diseases; Townsend deprivation scores were assigned by linking postcodes to enumeration districts. Relative indices of inequality were calculated to estimate the magnitude of the association between socioeconomic position and morbidity.
RESULTS: The response rate was 85.3%. The prevalence of most of the conditions rose with increasing material deprivation. The relative index of inequalilty, for both sexes combined, was greater than 1 for all conditions except diabetes. The conditions most strongly associated with deprivation were diabetic eye disease (relative index of inequality 3.21; 95% confidence interval 1.84 to 5.59), emphysema (2.72; 1.67 to 4.43) and bronchitis (2.27; 1.92 to 2.68). The relative index of inequality was significantly higher in women for asthma (P < 0.05) and in men for depression (P < 0.01). The mean reporting of prevalent conditions was 1.07 for the most deprived fifth of respondents and 0.77 in the most affluent fifth (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Material deprivation is strongly linked with many common diseases. NHS resource allocation should be modified to reflect such morbidity differentials.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app