Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Hormone receptor status of breast tumors in black, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic white women. An analysis of 13,239 cases.

Cancer 1996 April 16
BACKGROUND: It has been postulated that different biologic characteristics of a tumor might account for at least a portion of the disparity in breast cancer survival for patients across racial and ethnic groups. The hormone receptor status of breast tumors is one characteristic with prognostic significance. Results of several studies indicate a higher proportion of estrogen receptor negative (ER-) breast tumors among black or Hispanic women compared with non-Hispanic whites. We investigated whether the association between race and ethnicity and the joint combination of ER and progesterone receptor (PR) status was independent of age and other tumor characteristics at diagnosis.

METHODS: Relevant data were obtained from 13,239 breast cancer cases identified as part of the 1990 Patient Care Evaluation Study of Breast Cancer.

RESULTS: In univariate analysis, the proportions of ER+PR+, ER+PR-, ER-PR+, and ER-PR- tumors among non-Hispanics whites were 59%, 15%, 6%, and 20%, respectively; among Hispanics the proportions were 58%, 12%, 8%, and 22%, respectively; and among blacks the proportions were 44%, 14%, 7%, and 35%, respectively. After controlling for age, tumor size, and histology, using polychotomous logistic regression, these was no difference in hormone-receptor status between Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women. However, ER-PR- tumors were more likely to occur in blacks than in non-Hispanic whites (odds ratio = 1.8, 95% confidence interval = 1.6, 2.1)

CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study corroborate differences in hormone-receptor status between non-Hispanic white and black women, but not between Hispanics. Future studies of breast cancer should examine differences in epidemiologic risk factors between blacks and whites stratified on ER/PR status.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app