Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Biomechanical comparison of reconstruction techniques in simulated lateral ankle ligament injury.

Eighteen intact ankles were loaded with inversion-eversion and anterior-posterior forces, and motions of the talus and calcaneus were measured. Ankles were tested in neutral, 15 degrees of dorsiflexion, and 15 degrees of plantar flexion. The anterior talofibular ligament was then sectioned and testing was repeated. In half the specimens the calcaneofibular ligament was also sectioned followed by repeat testing. The Evans, Watson-Jones, and Chrisman-Snook procedures were performed on each ankle and testing was repeated. With inversion-eversion loading, only the Chrisman-Snook reconstruction resulted in a significantly more stable ankle joint complex than in the anterior talofibular ligament cut ankles. All three reconstructions increased ankle stability over the anterior talofibular and calcaneofibular ligament cut state. With anterior-posterior loading, all reconstructions resulted in a significantly more stable ankle joint complex than the anterior talofibular ligament cut ankles. The Evans and Chrisman-Snook procedures resulted in more stability than the anterior talofibular and calcaneofibular ligament cut ankles. There was no difference in subtalar joint motion with inversion-eversion loading among ankles with the anterior talofibular ligament cut and those with any of the reconstructions. For the anterior talofibular and calcaneofibular ligament cut ankles, subtalar joint motion was similar to that in intact ankles after each reconstruction. All three reconstructions resulted in ankles with significantly less subtalar joint motion with anterior-posterior loading than ankles with the anterior talofibular ligament cut or with the anterior talofibular and calcaneofibular ligaments cut. The Chrisman-Snook procedure resulted in ankles with significantly less motion than intact ankles.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app