COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Association of rectal prolapse with colorectal cancer.
Surgery 1996 January
BACKGROUND: Although screening for colorectal cancer facilitates earlier detection and improves survival, cost-effective screening requires identification of patients at high risk for colorectal cancer. Rectal prolapse has not been clearly linked to colorectal carcinoma. Whether patients with rectal prolapse should be screened for colorectal cancer is therefore unclear.
METHODS: We retrospectively identified 70 consecutive patients treated for rectal prolapse at a community hospital during a period of 16 years and monitored for an average of 4.4 +/- 2.7 years and 350 patients of similar age treated for chronic unrelated conditions in the same institution during a similar period. We determined their incidence of colorectal cancer and sought demographic correlates.
RESULTS: The prevalence of rectosigmoid carcinoma among patients with prolapse was 5.7% during the study. Only 1.4% of the comparative group had colorectal cancer. Thus patients with rectal prolapse exhibited a 4.2-fold (95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 16.0) relative risk for colorectal cancer over the comparative group (p < 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: To the extent to which these patients represent the population of patients with rectal prolapse, routine initial screening of patients with symptomatic rectal prolapse by use of flexible sigmoidoscopy may be appropriate.
METHODS: We retrospectively identified 70 consecutive patients treated for rectal prolapse at a community hospital during a period of 16 years and monitored for an average of 4.4 +/- 2.7 years and 350 patients of similar age treated for chronic unrelated conditions in the same institution during a similar period. We determined their incidence of colorectal cancer and sought demographic correlates.
RESULTS: The prevalence of rectosigmoid carcinoma among patients with prolapse was 5.7% during the study. Only 1.4% of the comparative group had colorectal cancer. Thus patients with rectal prolapse exhibited a 4.2-fold (95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 16.0) relative risk for colorectal cancer over the comparative group (p < 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: To the extent to which these patients represent the population of patients with rectal prolapse, routine initial screening of patients with symptomatic rectal prolapse by use of flexible sigmoidoscopy may be appropriate.
Full text links
Trending Papers
Carvedilol, probably the β-blocker of choice for everyone with cirrhosis and portal hypertension: But not so fast!Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver 2023 June
Evidence-Based Guideline for the diagnosis and management of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis.Nature Reviews. Rheumatology 2023 May 10
Advances in Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment: Current Status and Future Directions.AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology 2023 May 19
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
Read by QxMD is copyright © 2021 QxMD Software Inc. All rights reserved. By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app