Clinical Trial
Comparative Study
Controlled Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Variations in mortality and length of stay in intensive care units.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the amount of variation in in-hospital mortality and length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay that can be accounted for by clinical data available at ICU admission.

DESIGN: Inception cohort study.

SETTING: Forty-two ICUs in 40 hospitals, including 26 hospitals that were randomly selected and 14 large tertiary care hospitals that volunteered for the study.

PARTICIPANTS: A consecutive sample of 16,622 patients and 17,440 ICU admissions.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN OUTCOMES: Data on selected demographic characteristics, comorbidity, and specific physiologic variables were recorded during the first ICU day for an average of 415 admissions at each ICU; hospital discharge status (dead or alive) and length of ICU stay were recorded for individual patients; and the ratio of actual to predicted in-hospital mortality, standardized mortality ratios, and the ratio of actual to predicted length of ICU stay were recorded for individual ICUs.

RESULTS: Unadjusted in-hospital mortality rates for the 42 units varied from 6.4% to 40%, and 90% (R2 = 0.90) of this variation was attributable to patient characteristics at admission. The standard mortality ratio varied from 0.67 to 1.25. The mean unadjusted length of ICU stay varied from 3.3 to 7.3 days, and 78% of the variation (R2 = 0.78) was attributed to patient and selected institutional characteristics. The best performing unit had a length of stay ratio of 0.88, whereas the poorest performing unit had a ratio of 1.21.

CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians can use readily available admission data to adjust for considerable variations in patient severity and type in different ICUs. Such data should permit precise evaluation and comparison of ICU effectiveness and efficiency, which varied substantially in this study, and result in improved methods of risk prediction and evaluation of new medical practices.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app