We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
The use of structured, complaint-specific patient encounter forms in the emergency department.
Annals of Emergency Medicine 1993 May
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of preprinted, structured, complaint-specific patient encounter forms on documentation, use of testing, and treatment compared with free-text record keeping.
DESIGN: Nonrandomized case-control trial.
SETTING: University-affiliated, tertiary referral hospital emergency department.
METHODS: The records of all patients with lacerations, pharyngitis, asthma, or isolated closed-head injury during an eight-month period were reviewed.
INTERVENTION: Use of structured complaint-specific patient encounter forms versus traditional free-text record keeping.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The null hypothesis was that there would be no differences in documentation, test use, or practice when the structured forms were used compared with free-text record keeping.
RESULTS: Differences in documentation that favored the use of the structured forms for all four problems studied were seen consistently. Not only was documentation improved, but test use also was affected in a way that decreased use. In addition, in certain areas (eg, treatment of pharyngitis), clinical practice also was changed.
CONCLUSION: Structured, problem-specific ED records improve documentation and affect both resource use and clinical practice. These forms may be useful for improving communication and reimbursement as well as for medicolegal documentation. They provide a method for standardized quality assurance review and clinical data abstraction. Finally, they provide a method for active dissemination of clinical standards.
DESIGN: Nonrandomized case-control trial.
SETTING: University-affiliated, tertiary referral hospital emergency department.
METHODS: The records of all patients with lacerations, pharyngitis, asthma, or isolated closed-head injury during an eight-month period were reviewed.
INTERVENTION: Use of structured complaint-specific patient encounter forms versus traditional free-text record keeping.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The null hypothesis was that there would be no differences in documentation, test use, or practice when the structured forms were used compared with free-text record keeping.
RESULTS: Differences in documentation that favored the use of the structured forms for all four problems studied were seen consistently. Not only was documentation improved, but test use also was affected in a way that decreased use. In addition, in certain areas (eg, treatment of pharyngitis), clinical practice also was changed.
CONCLUSION: Structured, problem-specific ED records improve documentation and affect both resource use and clinical practice. These forms may be useful for improving communication and reimbursement as well as for medicolegal documentation. They provide a method for standardized quality assurance review and clinical data abstraction. Finally, they provide a method for active dissemination of clinical standards.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Anti-Arrhythmic Effects of Heart Failure Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy and Their Role in the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death: From Beta-Blockers to Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors and Beyond.Journal of Clinical Medicine 2024 Februrary 27
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app