We have located links that may give you full text access.
Clinical Trial
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Predictors of survival following relapse or progression of small cell lung cancer. Southwest Oncology Group Study 8605 report and analysis of recurrent disease data base.
Cancer 1993 August 16
BACKGROUND: Survival after relapse or progression of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is poor. The Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) initiated a study of modulation of cyclophosphamide (Cy) resistance in this population. At study closure, the value of testing new regimens in previously treated patients was being debated nationally: Is there an independent impact of treatment over favorable prognostic factors? Thus, the authors analyzed the SWOG recurrent SCLC data base.
METHODS: A 12-hour infusion of cytosine arabinoside (ara-C) was used as a potential repair inhibitor of Cy-induced DNA damage in patients with relapsed SCLC. A data base of successive SWOG studies in recurrent SCLC was formed. The independent contribution to survival of prognostic factors, type of prior chemotherapy (CT), time from diagnosis, and type of CT on relapse were then assessed.
RESULTS: There were 3 partial responses observed in 67 patients, with substantial myelotoxicity. The median survival was 2.5 months, and 16% lived beyond 6 months. The multivariate analysis of the recurrent SCLC data base found that a normal lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and second-line treatment with etoposide plus cisplatin (EP), if not initially treated with either alternating or complex multidrug regimens, were the only independent predictors of improved survival. The 2-year survival of this subset was 20%.
CONCLUSIONS: The Cy/ara-C program cannot be recommended for patients with recurrent SCLC. However, EP independently contributed to improved survival in patients without complex prior CT and a normal LDH. This finding supports future trials of new approaches in certain subsets of SCLC patients with limited prior treatment.
METHODS: A 12-hour infusion of cytosine arabinoside (ara-C) was used as a potential repair inhibitor of Cy-induced DNA damage in patients with relapsed SCLC. A data base of successive SWOG studies in recurrent SCLC was formed. The independent contribution to survival of prognostic factors, type of prior chemotherapy (CT), time from diagnosis, and type of CT on relapse were then assessed.
RESULTS: There were 3 partial responses observed in 67 patients, with substantial myelotoxicity. The median survival was 2.5 months, and 16% lived beyond 6 months. The multivariate analysis of the recurrent SCLC data base found that a normal lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and second-line treatment with etoposide plus cisplatin (EP), if not initially treated with either alternating or complex multidrug regimens, were the only independent predictors of improved survival. The 2-year survival of this subset was 20%.
CONCLUSIONS: The Cy/ara-C program cannot be recommended for patients with recurrent SCLC. However, EP independently contributed to improved survival in patients without complex prior CT and a normal LDH. This finding supports future trials of new approaches in certain subsets of SCLC patients with limited prior treatment.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app