We have located links that may give you full text access.
A prospective study of ingested foreign bodies in Singapore.
Archives of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery 1994 January
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the following: the symptoms, physical signs, investigation, and treatment of impacted foreign bodies (FBs); the dimensions of FBs according to site of impaction; and epidemiology, risk factors, and complications of FB ingestion.
DESIGN: Prospective analysis of 397 patients with a history of FB ingestion.
SETTING: Department of Otolaryngology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, a referral center with institutional practice.
PATIENTS: Of the 397 patients treated between May and December 1991, ingested FBs were found in 197 patients.
INTERVENTION: Foreign bodies were removed with forceps under direct or indirect vision; if this was impossible, removal was done endoscopically.
RESULTS: Dysphagia, positive laryngeal rub, and drinking water tests had high sensitivity and specificity for esophageal FBs. Large and rigid FBs of various shapes tend to lodge in piriform fossae and esophagus and might cause complications if not removed early. The risk factors of FB ingestion were use of dentures and Chinese method of cooking and eating. The complication rate of impacted FBs was 5.1% and increased with the delay in seeking treatment. Flexible esophagoscope was found to be as effective as rigid esophagoscope in retrieving esophageal FBs. Lesions simulating impacted FBs were found in nine patients. In 162 patients in whom no FB was found, the symptoms resolved spontaneously within 16 days.
CONCLUSION: Dysphagia, positive laryngeal rub, and drinking water tests are indicative of impacted FBs that must be removed early to prevent complications. Ability to use both rigid and flexible esophagoscopes is advantageous in FB retrieval.
DESIGN: Prospective analysis of 397 patients with a history of FB ingestion.
SETTING: Department of Otolaryngology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, a referral center with institutional practice.
PATIENTS: Of the 397 patients treated between May and December 1991, ingested FBs were found in 197 patients.
INTERVENTION: Foreign bodies were removed with forceps under direct or indirect vision; if this was impossible, removal was done endoscopically.
RESULTS: Dysphagia, positive laryngeal rub, and drinking water tests had high sensitivity and specificity for esophageal FBs. Large and rigid FBs of various shapes tend to lodge in piriform fossae and esophagus and might cause complications if not removed early. The risk factors of FB ingestion were use of dentures and Chinese method of cooking and eating. The complication rate of impacted FBs was 5.1% and increased with the delay in seeking treatment. Flexible esophagoscope was found to be as effective as rigid esophagoscope in retrieving esophageal FBs. Lesions simulating impacted FBs were found in nine patients. In 162 patients in whom no FB was found, the symptoms resolved spontaneously within 16 days.
CONCLUSION: Dysphagia, positive laryngeal rub, and drinking water tests are indicative of impacted FBs that must be removed early to prevent complications. Ability to use both rigid and flexible esophagoscopes is advantageous in FB retrieval.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app